Get the real story via our monthly newsletter

Search

    2
    0

rss

Send to a colleague

Home > Commentary > Trends Archive > The case against TypoScript

Browse TrendWatch Blog

Recent Blog Entries

The Complete Archive

Trends by Vendor


TrendWatch by Channel

Web Content Management Trends

Enterprise Portals Trends

ECM Trends

Web Analytics Trends

Enterprise Search Trends

SharePoint Trends

Digital & Media Asset Management Trends

XML & Component Content Management Trends

E-mail Archiving & Management Trends


Report Excerpt

The Web CMS Report 2009 looks at... TYPO3

"While its LAMP architecture makes it possible to run on inexpensive hardware, the application is relatively resource-intensive due to the layers of abstraction and complexity built into the architecture. Whereas simpler PHP-based WCM systems are customized by modifying or writing PHP code, TYPO3 has implemented a whole new configuration language that needs to be parsed and interpreted by PHP which is, itself, an interpreted language."

(p. 699)

More about The Web CMS Report 2009

Our customers say

"This excellent report has saved weeks of work reviewing the market place to enable a tender to be sent out to just a handful of potential vendors in record time. Well done.
- - Martin Beake,
ITT Consultant, 2Sys Limited, Malmesbury, UK

NEW at CMS Watch

The Web CMS Report 2009 The Web CMS Report 2009: In its 15th edition, this report evaluates 42 web content management systems and vendors... Read more
The ECM Suites Report 2009 The ECM Suites Report 2009: This report evaluates 30 ECM offerings... Read more
Technology Transfer in Rome Join us in Rome: On November 6-7 in Rome, CMS Watch's Theresa Regli will teach a tutorial on "Enterprise Search Technology and How to Optimize It"... Read more

 

TrendWatch Blog

The case against TypoScript

10-May-2007

Typo3 is a longstanding and very popular open source Web CMS. Although written in PHP, Typo3 employs its own declarative configuration language called "TypoScript" for templating. TypoScript's language and syntax are sufficiently complicated to merit an entire book on it. In our research for past several editions of The Web CMS Report, nearly every Typo3 developer or project manager we contacted told us privately they had a love/hate relationship with TypoScript. However, in blogosphere it seems like "love" has been prevailing. But then I happened across this comment: "I think TypoScript is a completely unnecessary atrocity." To be fair, many other Web CMS tools have their own scripting languages (e.g., Stellent's "iDoc") or use obscure tag libraries. Regardless of product, make sure to understand the long-term development implications of any package you select.

- Submitted by: Tony Byrne, Analyst

All CMS Channel Trends

Join the conversation

Digg This! Search Technorati Tag it on Del.icio.us



Get a Free Sample

Wondering about CMS Watch research? Sign up to receive free samples of any of our products.




What we do

CMS Watch™ evaluates content-oriented technologies, publishing head-to-head comparative reviews of leading solutions. What makes us special?

  • Our critical analysis exposes product weaknesses as well as strengths
  • We deliver unrivaled technical depth and comprehensive project advice
  • Our research is led by international topic experts
  • We only work for buyers -- never for vendors

Contact us

CMS Watch

info@cmswatch.com

18113 Town Center Drive, Ste 217

Olney, MD USA 20832

1 800 325 6190 (customer service)

+1 617 763 5336 (int'l customer service)

Fax: +1 214 242 3048