Get the real story via our monthly newsletter

Search

    2
    0

rss

Send to a colleague

Home > Commentary > Trends Archive > Four words to drop from your RFP -- and one to add

Browse TrendWatch Blog

Recent Blog Entries

The Complete Archive

Trends by Vendor


TrendWatch by Channel

Web Content Management Trends

Enterprise Portals Trends

ECM Trends

Web Analytics Trends

Enterprise Search Trends

SharePoint


Report Excerpt

The ECM Suites Report 2008 looks at... Day Software's Neutral API

"Day has developed a series of connectors that rely on the JSR 170 standard to provide a neutral API to develop content applications atop ECM repositories from: ECM/Documentum, FileNet, Open Text, Lotus Notes, Interwoven Team Site, SharePoint, and Vignette, among others ..."

(p. 315)

More about The ECM Suites Report 2008

 

TrendWatch Blog

Four words to drop from your RFP -- and one to add

16-Apr-2007

In product selection, as in life, the key to differentiating among possible alternatives is precision. Vague, wordy RFPs (or "tenders" for our international readers) beget vague, wordy responses. Taking a scenario-based approach can help you make very specific assertions and requests. You can also help your enterprise by removing conveniently ambiguous buzz-words. Here's four that I think you can safely drop from any RFP:

  • Integrate. This word allows you and the vendor to conspire in postponing discussion of the hard work coming your way. Instead, articulate specific needs for read- or write-access to repositories, as well as event-triggers across systems. Extra credit: lose seamless too. Seams are part of the fabric of all software.
  • Intuitive. To whom? Vendors are justifiably proud of their tools and deem them easy to use. Remember: usability is fitness to purpose, so discover your colleagues' true purpose in employing any tool.
  • Robust. Vendor-speak. If you mean "multifunctional," or "development platform," you may unintentionally mitigate against ease of use.
  • Compliant. Sure, standards are important, but adherence is always relative. What do you really want out of a system that espouses J2EE/.NET/WSRP/JSR 170/Etc. compliance?

Here's a word to employ more frequently at the beginning of any question: How. Vendors differentiate less on what they do than how they do it. Good luck in your product search!

- Submitted by: Tony Byrne, Analyst

All ECM Channel Trends

Join the conversation

Digg This! Search Technorati Tag it on Del.icio.us



Get a Free Sample

Wondering about CMS Watch research? Sign up to receive free samples of any of our products.




What we do

CMS Watch™ evaluates content-oriented technologies, publishing head-to-head comparative reviews of leading solutions. What makes us special?

  • Our critical analysis exposes product weaknesses as well as strengths
  • We deliver unrivaled technical depth and comprehensive project advice
  • Our research is led by international topic experts
  • We only work for buyers -- never for vendors

Contact us

CMS Watch

info@cmswatch.com

18113 Town Center Drive, Ste 217

Olney, MD USA 20832

1 800 325 6190 (N. America only)

+1 617 763 5336 (customer service)

+1 301 585 7004 (editorial)

Fax: +1 214 242 3048