Get the real story via our monthly newsletter

Search

    2
    0

rss

Send to a colleague

Home > Commentary > Trends Archive > Some small search vendors really do fade away

Browse TrendWatch Blog

Recent Blog Entries

The Complete Archive

Trends by Vendor


TrendWatch by Channel

Web Content Management Trends

Enterprise Portals Trends

ECM Trends

Web Analytics Trends

Enterprise Search Trends

SharePoint Trends

Digital & Media Asset Management Trends

XML & Component Content Management Trends

E-mail Archiving & Management Trends


Report Excerpt

The Enterprise Search Report 2008 looks at... Oracle: Secure Enterprise Search

"For now, it's a strong contender for those seeking secure search without the complications of the toolboxes IBM, Autonomy, and FAST have put on the market. You should be aware, though, that the interface is firmly Oracle-branded - if you want a purple Model-T Ford, you'll have to spray-paint your own Web Services application on top of it."

(p. 141)

More about The Enterprise Search Report 2008

Our customers say

"The Enterprise Search Report is jammed full of great stuff...
- - Lou Rosenfeld,
Leading independent information architecture guru

NEW at CMS Watch

The ECM Suites Report 2009 The ECM Suites Report 2009: This report evaluates 30 ECM offerings... Read more
ECM Education ECM Technology Online Courses: Alan Pelz-Sharpe instructs students on ECM Technology...Read more
jboye08 Join us in Denmark at jboye08: On November 4, CMS Watch will teach tutorials on Web Content Management, Enterprise Social Software, and SharePoint... Read more

 

TrendWatch Blog

Some small search vendors really do fade away

27-Sep-2006

In the last year or so, we've seen a couple of small enterprise search vendors disappear. First, Speed of Mind, an innovative Danish vendor that indexed Oracle text columns before Oracle figured out how to do it adequately themselves, and, more recently, Entopia, which tried to integrate social network analysis and several other buzzwords into the enterprise search experience. Normally, we don't subscribe to the general tenor of FUD around small vendors. In fact, "viability" frequently gets overweighted in product selection decisions. Nevertheless, there is a difference between, say, a small, inexpensive CMS vendor with a broad customer base, and niche search vendor with an pricey offering and smallish customer base. The former codebase can achieve staying power by dint of the sizable maintenance revenue, despite what happens to the vendor; the latter codebase is much more perishable when no one wants to support a limited clientele.

- Submitted by: Tony Byrne, Analyst

All Search Channel Trends

Join the conversation

Digg This! Search Technorati Tag it on Del.icio.us



Get a Free Sample

Wondering about CMS Watch research? Sign up to receive free samples of any of our products.




What we do

CMS Watch™ evaluates content-oriented technologies, publishing head-to-head comparative reviews of leading solutions. What makes us special?

  • Our critical analysis exposes product weaknesses as well as strengths
  • We deliver unrivaled technical depth and comprehensive project advice
  • Our research is led by international topic experts
  • We only work for buyers -- never for vendors

Contact us

CMS Watch

info@cmswatch.com

18113 Town Center Drive, Ste 217

Olney, MD USA 20832

1 800 325 6190 (customer service)

+1 617 763 5336 (int'l customer service)

Fax: +1 214 242 3048