Get the real story via our monthly newsletter

Search

    2
    0

rss

Send to a colleague

Home > Commentary > Trends Archive > The case against canned RFI/RFPs

Browse TrendWatch Blog

Recent Blog Entries

The Complete Archive

Trends by Vendor


TrendWatch by Channel

Web Content Management Trends

Enterprise Portals Trends

ECM Trends

Web Analytics Trends

Enterprise Search Trends

SharePoint Trends

Digital & Media Asset Management Trends

XML & Component Content Management Trends

E-mail Archiving & Management Trends

Enterprise Social Software Trends


Report Excerpt

The Web CMS Report 2008 looks at... Open Text: RedDot Content Management Server

"With the Version 7 release in 2006, about 25 percent of th back end was migrated from older COM technology to .NET. Some RedDot partners have been disappointed by the paucity of .NET support, as it makes it harder to insert or reuse other .NET components, and in general, working within older Microsoft technologies is not exactly a career ehhancer. "

(p. 206)

More about The Web CMS Report 2008

 

TrendWatch Blog

The case against canned RFI/RFPs

06-Dec-2005

CMS vendor Percussion is beating the drums again about its free Request for Information template. I have one piece of advice: don't use it. Every other vendor has seen it and will think the project is hardwired for Percussion. Of course, nearly every other vendor also distributes their own canned RFPs, albeit more subtly. (Well, not always subtle...consider the file I saw recently, titled "RedDot Centric RFP"...though I guess that's being honest!) The use of canned RFPs might help explain this common lament from buyers: "I sent an RFP to a dozen vendors and only 2 responded!" In addition to being very busy, vendors are also very suspicious. So if your competition is truly open -- and it should be -- don't suggest otherwise by starting with a canned template. Instead, challenge vendors with real narratives, and use your own voice for your own best solution. And if you're looking to start from a good short-list, consult Alan Pelz-Sharpe's fine article on the subject.

- Submitted by: Tony Byrne, Analyst

All CMS Channel Trends

Join the conversation

Digg This! Search Technorati Tag it on Del.icio.us



Get a Free Sample

Wondering about CMS Watch research? Sign up to receive free samples of any of our products.




What we do

CMS Watch™ evaluates content-oriented technologies, publishing head-to-head comparative reviews of leading solutions. What makes us special?

  • Our critical analysis exposes product weaknesses as well as strengths
  • We deliver unrivaled technical depth and comprehensive project advice
  • Our research is led by international topic experts
  • We only work for buyers -- never for vendors

Contact us

CMS Watch

info@cmswatch.com

18113 Town Center Drive, Ste 217

Olney, MD USA 20832

1 800 325 6190 (N. America only)

+1 617 763 5336 (customer service)

+1 301 585 7004 (editorial)

Fax: +1 214 242 3048