Get the real story via our monthly newsletter

Search

    2
    0

rss

Send to a colleague

Home > Commentary > Trends Archive > The challenge of mobile analytics - Part 2

Browse TrendWatch Blog

Recent Blog Entries

The Complete Archive

Trends by Vendor


TrendWatch by Channel

Web Content Management Trends

Enterprise Portals Trends

ECM Trends

Web Analytics Trends

Enterprise Search Trends

SharePoint Trends

Digital & Media Asset Management Trends

XML & Component Content Management Trends

E-mail Archiving & Management Trends


Report Excerpt

The Web Analytics Report 2008 looks at... Unica Affinium and Web 2.0 content

"Dealing with Flash, audio and video, and oft-changing content within pages may also present challenges, according to one experienced Unica customer. Creating the link-specific tags becomes highly labor intensive, and reporting still remains page-view focused and not event focused, which makes Unica less than ideal for sites using rich Internet applications (RIAs) or highly componentized content."

(p. 235)

More about The Web Analytics Report 2008

Our customers say

"The Web Analytics Report delivers unmatched detail and candor about web measurement technologies -- it's an ideal companion for anyone looking to invest in these tools.
- - Erik Hartman,
Consultant, Hartman Communicatie

NEW at CMS Watch

The Web CMS Report 2009 The Web CMS Report 2009: In its 15th edition, this report evaluates 42 web content management systems and vendors... Read more
The ECM Suites Report 2009 The ECM Suites Report 2009: This report evaluates 30 ECM offerings... Read more
Technology Transfer in Rome Join us in Rome: On November 6-7 in Rome, CMS Watch's Theresa Regli will teach a tutorial on "Enterprise Search Technology and How to Optimize It"... Read more

 

TrendWatch Blog

The challenge of mobile analytics - Part 2

12-Jun-2008

For those who've read The Challenge of Mobile Analytics - Part 1 and hoping that the picture is brighter in Part 2, well...it all depends.

If you are hoping for a silver bullet solution that will give you razor-sharp accuracy, and provide more robust metrics than the "traditional" vendors, you may be disappointed.

To recap: some new analytics vendors market themselves focused on mobile analytics, both from a branding perspective and because they have clearly committed to figuring out how best to capture and report on mobile web data. Meanwhile, traditional online analytics vendors haven't been as aggressive in this area. However, this doesn't mean that the mobile analytics vendors have necessarily come up with great solutions either. Right now, it seems the mobile-oriented players exceed the online analytics vendors in their integration of WURFL data as part of the service or software, usually enhanced with DeviceAtlas (which is considered to have a more current database than WURFL for phone and manufacturer information).

Let's look at a sampling of mobile-oriented vendors.

Amethon is a real-time reporting solution that has its roots in Australia and also provides multimedia (MMS) and short messaging services (SMS) tracking. The company's primary selling point is that it uses a packet sniffer-based (server side) data collection model. While this makes sense as a way to get around the many client-side challenges here (such as lack of mobile acceptance of JavaScript), if you don't want to host your own analytics solution, or you face resistance from your network admins in bringing new hardware into their environment, this could be a gating factor.

Bango Analytics is a UK-based SaaS offering that is an adjunct service to Bango's mobile content pay solution. Focused on campaign tracking, Bango Analytics uses an image tag data collection methodology based on directing campaign respondents to a Bango network landing page. This could be a constraint if you don't want to send people to a Bango URL.

Mobilytics is a SaaS supplier that also uses an image tag to collect data. However, the company says that they will incorporate a packet sniffing option as well in the next release. Mobilytics also claims that it will apply a scoring model and slider function to present a visualization of unique visitor accuracy based on the source of data collection. Following the example set by Dennis Mortenson to assess IndexTool's ability to meet WAA Standards, CEO Greg Harris recently provided some insight to how Mobilytics compares. A good effort, and one that should help add transparency to this new analytics field.

I'd expect the mobile analytics vendors to aggressively differentiate themselves while the online analytics vendors get their act together within the next two- to four years; but you'll still need to carefully assess whether their methodologies, architectures, and resulting reports make sense for you.

- Submitted by: Phil Kemelor, Contributing Analyst

All Analytics Channel Trends

Join the conversation

Digg This! Search Technorati Tag it on Del.icio.us



Get a Free Sample

Wondering about CMS Watch research? Sign up to receive free samples of any of our products.




What we do

CMS Watch™ evaluates content-oriented technologies, publishing head-to-head comparative reviews of leading solutions. What makes us special?

  • Our critical analysis exposes product weaknesses as well as strengths
  • We deliver unrivaled technical depth and comprehensive project advice
  • Our research is led by international topic experts
  • We only work for buyers -- never for vendors

Contact us

CMS Watch

info@cmswatch.com

18113 Town Center Drive, Ste 217

Olney, MD USA 20832

1 800 325 6190 (customer service)

+1 617 763 5336 (int'l customer service)

Fax: +1 214 242 3048