TrendWatch Blog
Cloud Computing and Content Management
30-May-2008
If there is a buzz around Web
2.0 in the Content Technology community, then there is a roar in the wider
IT community around Cloud
Computing.
It's a great term, "Cloud Computing," as it conjures up visions of
an invisible Internet -- an ether-like zone in the sky where computing power
and storage is unfettered by the petty restrictions of boxes, cables, and technicians.
Cloud computing sounds fluffy, it sounds cool, it sounds limitless, it sounds
like the future.
In fact Cloud Computing simply means moving things to big and bigger Data Centers.
Data Centers are anything but fluffy. They are huge, energy-sucking giants --
many the size of small towns. They are environmental disasters and the only
thing fluffy about them is the C02 emissions they belch out. Data
Centers will in time according to The
Uptime Institute become bigger polluters than the aviation industry. Data
Centers require massive amounts of energy to operate -- often as much energy
is used to cool the centers as to power them. All that heat has to go somewhere.
If you think your air conditioning unit is an ecological no-no, then consider
the AC demands on a data center the size of 5 football fields, then consider
further that according to market research firm IDC,
there are over 7,000 major data centers worldwide, and many more in the process
of being built. By the way, just because they are big does not make them efficient;
it is estimated that around 1/3rd of Data Center servers continually sit idle.
Yet there is very vocal group that thinks the Cloud is the future of ECM
and Archiving -- so, why
bother to dispose of data? Why not just send it to the "Cloud"
with its limitless processing and storage capacity? The people who run the Data
Centers, and those that sell equipment to run them such as Sun
Microsystems and EMC,
would all think that a good idea.
What puzzles me though is the contradiction between good Archiving and ECM practices
versus a demand for ever greater processing and storage capacity. Aside from
the fact that Cloud computing by definition means that your data has to move
to and from a distant location, and latency issues (and
simple physics) will always dictate that this will be slower than on-site
deployments, there are much more important issues to consider.
For if you only stop for a moment you will see that there is something fundamentally wrong with the Archiving/ECM equation. Take E-mail Archiving for example. Almost all EAM systems promise (and typically deliver) a reduction in storage capacity needs of about 80%. Good e-mail management can reduce that still further, till ultimately your e-mail mountain has dropped to less than 10% of its original size. In other words the efficient management of content can reduce server farms to single servers, with active archiving and disposal of redundant data keeping the volumes from growing exponentially. Now that is not only Green Computing, it's smart computing, because in reducing the data volumes, you increase the processing speeds by as much more than an order of magnitude and you leave a tiny carbon footprint. So much better than the SUV -- sorry, "Cloud" -- approach to computing.
- Submitted by: Alan Pelz-Sharpe, Analyst
Join the conversation
Get a Free Sample
Wondering about CMS Watch research? Sign up to receive free samples of any of our products.