Get the real story via our monthly newsletter

Search

    2
    0

rss

Send to a colleague

Home > Commentary > Trends Archive > Independence and Industry Analysts

Browse TrendWatch Blog

Recent Blog Entries

The Complete Archive

Trends by Vendor


TrendWatch by Channel

Web Content Management Trends

Enterprise Portals Trends

ECM Trends

Web Analytics Trends

Enterprise Search Trends

SharePoint Trends

Digital & Media Asset Management Trends

XML & Component Content Management Trends


Report Excerpt

The Web Analytics Report 2008 looks at... Creating report dashboards in Omniture

"Some customers report that while it can be easy to access and view complex data, they find it harder to pull simple information, such as summaries. Web analytics managers note that Omniture does not offer standard dashboard reports "out-of-the-box," leaving customers to build dashboards from scratch. So, while there is a great deal of flexibility in customizing dashboards, if you have many stakeholders, just getting started could itself present a significant project."

(p. 156)

More about The Web Analytics Report 2008

 

TrendWatch Blog

Independence and Industry Analysts

01-Feb-2008

Wall Street Journal columnist Lee Gomes wrote an interesting piece about industry analyst firm The Aberdeen Group. Gomes first wrote about Aberdeen in 2002, and that article contributed to the firm's collapse and eventual acquisition by Harte-Hanks. At the time, Gomes took issue with what he considered to be "pay-for-praise" analysis.

In this latest piece he revisits the issue and looks at Aberdeen's new "sponsored research" model. The full article and subsequent discussion is well worth a read, particularly if you are a buyer or consumer of analyst research. The fact of the matter is that the majority of industry analyst firms from the largest to the smallest are heavily dependent on vendor support to operate. They may claim to be independent, but we beg to differ on their interpretation of the word independent.

Why am I pointing this out to you? Simple, at CMS Watch we don't do "sponsored research" of any description. We do not consult to vendors. We do not write papers for them. We do not speak at their events. We don't even accept hotel and flights from them -- most large vendors cover analysts' costs to bring them to their user conferences -- we pay our own way.

This may not always make us popular with the vendors we write about, since many are used to having financial leverage over the "independent" analysts who write about them (though over the years we have seen more vendors come to value our neutrality -- once they come to understand it). Incredibly, much if not most of the research that you as a buyer of technology will pay for has already been funded fully or in part by the vendors. When you see a section in any evaluation labeled "challenges" instead of "weaknesses," you know something more than semantics is going on.

We think there's a better way. We write for you the buyer and user of technology, and only you, because in our experience, that's the only way to get the real story.

- Submitted by: Alan Pelz-Sharpe, Analyst

All Analytics Channel Trends

Join the conversation

Digg This! Search Technorati Tag it on Del.icio.us



Get a Free Sample

Wondering about CMS Watch research? Sign up to receive free samples of any of our products.




What we do

CMS Watch™ evaluates content-oriented technologies, publishing head-to-head comparative reviews of leading solutions. What makes us special?

  • Our critical analysis exposes product weaknesses as well as strengths
  • We deliver unrivaled technical depth and comprehensive project advice
  • Our research is led by international topic experts
  • We only work for buyers -- never for vendors

Contact us

CMS Watch

info@cmswatch.com

18113 Town Center Drive, Ste 217

Olney, MD USA 20832

1 800 325 6190 (N. America only)

+1 617 763 5336 (customer service)

+1 301 585 7004 (editorial)

Fax: +1 214 242 3048