Get the real story via our monthly newsletter

Search

    2
    0

rss

Send to a colleague

Home > Commentary > Trends Archive > What InfoWorld didn't tell you about Tridion

Browse TrendWatch Blog

Recent Blog Entries

The Complete Archive

Trends by Vendor


TrendWatch by Channel

Web Content Management Trends

Enterprise Portals Trends

ECM Trends

Web Analytics Trends

Enterprise Search Trends

SharePoint Trends

Digital & Media Asset Management Trends

XML & Component Content Management Trends


Report Excerpt

The Web CMS Report 2008 looks at... Tridion's content delivery architecture

"At its core, R5 wants to be a bundled management and delivery system, although it can pre-generate HTML and supports a mixed model of static/dynamic delivery. Architecturally, the product is really two distinct environments. On the CMS side, the technology is all Microsoft - a somewhat dated COM architecture. We've seen Tridion salespeople describe this back end as .NET-based. It's not. "

(p. 348)

More about The Web CMS Report 2008

 

TrendWatch Blog

What InfoWorld didn't tell you about Tridion

09-Jan-2008

Respected IT site (formerly magazine) InfoWorld recently packaged up many of its more positive product reviews from 2007 into a "2008 Technology of the Year" awards compilation. The reviews of some of the vendors we cover made me pause a bit.

Now, trade publications tend to emphasize what a product can do rather than what it cannot do, and that's useful. In fact, we could get better at describing product strengths ourselves. At the same time, if you rely exclusively on one-off reviews, you can miss some potentially very important product details, as well as nuances about the vendor itself.

So let's begin with the July, 2007 review of SDL Tridion's R5 Web CMS. The review was informative, if uniformly glowing, but we'd balance it with some other observations about Tridion you should know. For example...

  • ...that underneath the covers R5 is actually a kaleidoscope of COM, .NET, and Java technologies
  • That, as my colleague Kas Thomas puts it, you typically need two developer-years' effort to get a full site up and running
  • That Tridion-experienced developers remain in very short supply around the globe
  • That the R5 user interface is famously difficult to customize, as well as very IE-dependent

I could go on. To be clear, I'm not arguing that Tridion sucks. The company and product surely have their merits, and InfoWorld uncovered most of them. But in software, as in life, if something sounds too good to be true, it probably is. If you're going to implement complex technology, take the time to really get to know it before you commit.

- Submitted by: Tony Byrne, Analyst

All CMS Channel Trends

Join the conversation

Digg This! Search Technorati Tag it on Del.icio.us



Get a Free Sample

Wondering about CMS Watch research? Sign up to receive free samples of any of our products.




What we do

CMS Watch™ evaluates content-oriented technologies, publishing head-to-head comparative reviews of leading solutions. What makes us special?

  • Our critical analysis exposes product weaknesses as well as strengths
  • We deliver unrivaled technical depth and comprehensive project advice
  • Our research is led by international topic experts
  • We only work for buyers -- never for vendors

Contact us

CMS Watch

info@cmswatch.com

18113 Town Center Drive, Ste 217

Olney, MD USA 20832

1 800 325 6190 (N. America only)

+1 617 763 5336 (customer service)

+1 301 585 7004 (editorial)

Fax: +1 214 242 3048