Get the real story via our monthly newsletter

Search

    2
    0

rss

Send to a colleague

Home > Commentary > Trends Archive > Google Search Appliance still comes up short

Browse TrendWatch Blog

Recent Blog Entries

The Complete Archive

Trends by Vendor


TrendWatch by Channel

Web Content Management Trends

Enterprise Portals Trends

ECM Trends

Web Analytics Trends

Enterprise Search Trends

SharePoint Trends

Digital & Media Asset Management Trends

XML & Component Content Management Trends


Report Excerpt

The Enterprise Search Report 2008 looks at... Google Appliance

"Even Google's marketing won't go so far as to call their implementation "enterprise-class security," instead favoring to highlight single sign-on (which the Appliance supports quite well). Document-level security is handled late-binding - the result sets are filtered for hits a searcher is allowed to see, which requires the system to fire off separate requests for each hit to see if it may be displayed. This has only one advantage - the authorization will be up-to-date to the second - but, certainly in Google's implementation, several drawbacks. "

(p. 248)

More about The Enterprise Search Report 2008

 

TrendWatch Blog

Google Search Appliance still comes up short

10-Dec-2007

Last week, after giving a keynote on the current and future of Enterprise Search at the Online Information conference in London, the first question asked of me was, "Why shouldn't I just get Google? It's what my boss thinks is best." My fellow search analyst Adriaan Bloem and I probably get this question more than any other. Well, while speaking with Google Search Appliance (GSA) customers as part of the research for the 2008 Enterprise Search Report, we found that once customers reached the limits of the appliance, they were pretty much stuck. The GSA lacks the advanced tuning controls found in many other Enterprise Search products, so customers hit walls when:

  • indexing heterogeneous document stores
  • attempting to adhere to complex, document-level security requirements
  • collecting non-web-based, and in particular, SharePoint-based information

As you would expect, Google disagrees with our analysis. We think their marketing is ahead of their technology. You can read more about why the GSA isn't all wine and roses in today's press release, or in-depth in our Report.

- Submitted by: Theresa Regli, Analyst

All Search Channel Trends

Join the conversation

Digg This! Search Technorati Tag it on Del.icio.us



Get a Free Sample

Wondering about CMS Watch research? Sign up to receive free samples of any of our products.




What we do

CMS Watch™ evaluates content-oriented technologies, publishing head-to-head comparative reviews of leading solutions. What makes us special?

  • Our critical analysis exposes product weaknesses as well as strengths
  • We deliver unrivaled technical depth and comprehensive project advice
  • Our research is led by international topic experts
  • We only work for buyers -- never for vendors

Contact us

CMS Watch

info@cmswatch.com

18113 Town Center Drive, Ste 217

Olney, MD USA 20832

1 800 325 6190 (N. America only)

+1 617 763 5336 (customer service)

+1 301 585 7004 (editorial)

Fax: +1 214 242 3048