Get the real story via our bi-monthly newsletter

Search

    4
    0

rss

Send to a colleague

Home > Commentary > Trends Archive > Survey on university CMS adoption

Browse TrendWatch Blog

Recent Blog Entries

The Complete Archive

Trends by Vendor


TrendWatch by Channel

Web Content Management Trends

Enterprise Portals Trends

ECM Trends

Web Analytics Trends

Enterprise Search Trends

SharePoint Trends

Digital & Media Asset Management Trends

XML & Component Content Management Trends

E-mail Archiving & Management Trends

Enterprise Social Software & Collaboration Trends


Report Excerpt

The Web CMS Report looks at... Enonic Vertical Site

"Vertical Site's strict dependence on XSLT technology is not unusual in this tier, but as a practical matter it means that if you are creating anything more than a small number of mostly-not-very-complex templates, you will need significant in-house domain expertise in XSLT programming in order to create, test, debug, and maintain the various templates that will power your site. (Note that Enonic co-bundles no XSLT development tools.)"

(p. 494)

More about The Web CMS Report

Our customers say

"The Web CMS Report is worth every penny!
- - Gil Côté,
President and CTO, iStudio Canada Inc.

NEW at CMS Watch

The Search and Information Access ReportThe Search & Information Access Report: This newly updated 341-page Search and Information Access Report critically evaluates 23 Search and Information Access offerings from around the globe... Read more

The Enterprise Collaboration & Community Software ReportThe Enterprise Collaboration & Community Software Report : This newly updated research critically evaluates 27 Enterprise Collaboration and Community Software products head-to-head... Read more

The Enterprise Content Management ReportThe Enterprise Content Management Report : This newly updated research critically evaluates 32 Enterprise Content Management products head-to-head... Read more

 
 

TrendWatch Blog

Survey on university CMS adoption

07-Nov-2007   --  

A Web CMS survey conducted by the University of California at Davis (preliminary results of which were released October 22, 2007) made official what many of us suspected all along: Even the best minds in the world can't agree on how to do content management. Of the 81 (out of 129) respondents who are currently using a Web CMS, roughly 20% (18 respondents) have rolled their own solution. The other 63 institutions are using 39 different branded solutions. The fragmentation of this market is really quite stunning. Can you imagine 63 colleges using 39 different word processor programs?

Quantitatively, the UCD numbers are a bit on the thin side. What survey lacks in statistical significance, however, it makes up for in qualitative poignancy. The comments page makes interesting reading. The usual themes emerge: Know your requirements up front. Get buy-in from all constituencies, not just IT. Budget for training. Expect things to take longer than you thought.

An interesting bit of subtext that seems to weave together many of the survey respondents' comments is that when rolling out a Web CMS, the cost of failure is often better-defined than the cost of success. If a system rolls out within budget and fails due to (say) poor adoption, the cost of the exercise is well known. If, on the other hand, a system rolls out to great fanfare, unanticipated costs can surface.

"Adding a CMS changes how people think about the web," one survey respondent said, pointing out that when authors are able to post content in real- or near-real-time, it gives them a new sense of what's possible. "In the days when you needed a programmer to do just about anything in a site, people settled for getting very little done. Now they may assume they can have a lot for very little cost, so expectations management becomes a real educational endeavor."

One survey respondent said: "Be very conscious that if you do succeed with a vision of centralized management of a decentralized publishing system . . . the infrastructure (server and database) may not be able to handle the load of success, even with a scalable system."

Several of those surveyed warned against buying more functionality than needed, lest users add unexpected administrative (or other) burdens. This corroborates our research suggesting that most Web CMS customers face a greater risk of over-buying than under-buying. As one person said: "Getting the right system to meet your needs is the trick, not getting a great system."

- Submitted by: Kas Thomas, Analyst - Twitter: kasthomas

All CMS Channel Trends

Join the conversation

Digg This! Search Technorati Tag it on Del.icio.us




Get a Free Sample

Wondering about CMS Watch research? Sign up to receive free samples of any of our products.




What we do

CMS Watch™ evaluates content-oriented technologies, publishing head-to-head comparative reviews of leading solutions. What makes us special?

  • Our critical analysis exposes product weaknesses as well as strengths
  • We deliver unrivaled technical depth and comprehensive project advice
  • Our research is led by international topic experts
  • We only work for buyers -- never for vendors

Contact us

CMS Watch

info@cmswatch.com

3470 Olney-Laytonsville Road Suite 131

Olney, MD USA 20832

1 800 325 6190

1 617 340 6464

UK: +44 2033181911

Fax: +1 617 340 3541