Get the real story via our bi-monthly newsletter

Search

    4
    0

rss

Send to a colleague

Home > Commentary > Trends Archive > De-mystifying the Gartner ECM Magic Quadrant

Browse TrendWatch Blog

Recent Blog Entries

The Complete Archive

Trends by Vendor


TrendWatch by Channel

Web Content Management Trends

Enterprise Portals Trends

ECM Trends

Web Analytics Trends

Enterprise Search Trends

SharePoint Trends

Digital & Media Asset Management Trends

XML & Component Content Management Trends

E-mail Archiving & Management Trends

Enterprise Social Software & Collaboration Trends


Report Excerpt

The ECM Suites Report 2009 looks at... Docubase's Client Server-Based Approach

"Unusual for an ECM provider in 2007, Docubase retains primarily a client server-based approach to Document Management. It requires Windows NT, 2000 or XP at the client end, and typically a Windows server at the back end ..."

(p. 316)

More about The ECM Suites Report 2009

Our customers say

"The analysis of core technologies from a number of different perspectives will prove most helpful to ECM consumers. It is the most comprehensive analysis of the state of the industry for ECM that I have reviewed.
- - Len Asprey, Director, Practical Information Management Solutions Pty Ltd, and,
Author, Integrative Document and Content Management

NEW at CMS Watch

The Enterprise Social Software & Collaboration Report 2009The Enterprise Social Software & Collaboration Report 2009: This newly updated research critically evaluates 27 Enterprise Social Software and Collaboration packages... Read more

The Enterprise Portals Report 2009The Enterprise Portals Report 2009: This newly updated research critically evaluates 12 Enterprise Portals products head-to-head... Read more

The Digital & Media Asset Management Report 2009The Digital & Media Asset Management Report 2009: This newly updated research critically evaluates 20 DAM suppliers head-to-head... Read more

 
 

TrendWatch Blog

De-mystifying the Gartner ECM Magic Quadrant

28-Sep-2007   --  

Late last year we blogged on the 2006 Gartner Magic Quadrant (MQ) for ECM - and made the point that inclusion in the chart is believed by vendors to have a very positive impact on their sales.

In the 2007 MQ - published this past week - it's clear that little (in Gartner's view) has changed in the ECM world. Well, we beg to differ: 2007 has been a period of major change! And so rather than harping on perceived weaknesses in this highly influential document, let's point out where the analysis in our ECM Suites Report differs from Gartner's.

  1. CMS Watch recognizes that there are valid and increasingly plausible and popular open source options for ECM making an impact on the market as a whole. Alfresco, Nuxeo, Knowledge Tree, Jahia and InfoGrid are all credible options. Yet not even a mention of Alfresco (who have been almost ubiquitous in the press this year) is made in the Gartner report.
  2. We see regional richness and diversity amongst ECM suppliers around the globe. Look for example at the impact of NewGen in India, Asia and the Middle East - or Saperion in Europe. Neither of whom get a mention.
  3. We don't grade vendors on the size of their revenue -- rather on their viability and the quality of their products. Many products make less than $20 Million a year (a criteria for inclusion in the MQ), yet are profitable, stable, and produce very high quality products.
  4. We differentiate vendors by scenarios, i.e., by where their product would be best suited. For example Cimage, Spescom and Formtek (only Cimage is included in the MQ) might all be prime candidates in an Engineering DM situation. Vendors have both domain expertise and products that have been designed to excel in some situations but not others. We think it's important that you know those differences and are able to compare like for like before selecting a shortlist based on vague concepts such as "leadership and vision."

There are other things about this report that baffle us - like why SAP is included in it, when even the report itself states that they do not have an ECM Suite - when others that do sell ECM Suites (such as those we mention above) are excluded. It may seem unfair to pick on another analyst firm - and for the record the authors of this particular report are all experts we have great respect for - but the importance of the MQ in the buying process is so huge that it demands a critical assessment and evaluation.

If there is a problem to identify, it is likely a business model that hinges on such charts, and a public's demand for ever simplified information, along with the vendors addiction to getting the "right" placement in the chart. It is both the beauty and the curse of the MQ that it dramatically simplifies a marketplace. But ECM tools and choices are far from simple. In short, buyers of ECM beware.

- Submitted by: Alan Pelz-Sharpe, Analyst

All ECM Channel Trends

Join the conversation

Digg This! Search Technorati Tag it on Del.icio.us




Get a Free Sample

Wondering about CMS Watch research? Sign up to receive free samples of any of our products.




What we do

CMS Watch™ evaluates content-oriented technologies, publishing head-to-head comparative reviews of leading solutions. What makes us special?

  • Our critical analysis exposes product weaknesses as well as strengths
  • We deliver unrivaled technical depth and comprehensive project advice
  • Our research is led by international topic experts
  • We only work for buyers -- never for vendors

Contact us

CMS Watch

info@cmswatch.com

3470 Olney-Laytonsville Road Suite 131

Olney, MD USA 20832

1 800 325 6190 (customer service)

+1 617 763 5336 (int'l customer service)

Fax: +1 214 242 3048