<?xml version="1.0" encoding="us-ascii"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.cmswatch.com" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
   <channel>
      <title>CMS Watch ZL Feed</title>
      <link>http://www.cmswatch.com</link>
      <description>CMS Watch headlines about ZL</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon,  5 Jan 2009 22:00:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <dc:creator>editor@cmswatch.com (Tony Byrne)</dc:creator>
      <dc:rights>Copyright 2005, CMS Watch</dc:rights>
      <dc:publisher>CMS Watch</dc:publisher>
      
      <item>
         <title>Announcing the E-mail Archiving and Management Report</title>
         <description>This may well go down as the busiest period in CMS Watch's history as this 
  month we launch yet another new technology evaluation report, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/E-mail/Report/&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The E-mail 
  Archiving &amp;amp; Management Report 2008&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;. From &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/About/Press/200805E-mail&quot;&gt;our release&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;EAM technology has become critical to both commercial and government enterprises 
  -- but for a variety of different and sometimes conflicting reasons. This 
  has led to a similarly diverse set of approaches from EAM suppliers...&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;/ul&gt;
  
&lt;p&gt;It's somewhat surprising that this report -- which provides comprehensive comparative 
  evaluations of 14 leading EAM vendors -- is one of the first of its kind anywhere.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Reports/Subscriptions/&quot;&gt;Subscribers&lt;/a&gt;, you will be getting your copy very shortly. Others can &lt;a href=&quot;http://cmsworks.stores.yahoo.net/eamr.html&quot;&gt;order a 
  copy&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Reports/Try/&quot;&gt;download a free sample here&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;The report loosely groups EAM vendors into three categories: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Policy-Centric: Autonomy, CA, Open Text, IBM, and Symantec &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Archive-Centric: AXS-One, EMC, HP, Mimosa, and ZL Technologies &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SaaS: Dell, Fortiva, Google, and Microsoft&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The research has taken more than six months to complete, and in the process 
  we have talked to many customers and users of EAM systems. The conversations 
  were illuminating and we look forward very much to continue those discussions 
  moving forward.</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1243-Announcing-the-E-mail-Archiving-and-Management-Report?source=RSS</link>
         <category>E-mail Archiving and Management</category>
         <author>aps@cmswatch.com(Alan Pelz-Sharpe)</author>
         <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 21:29:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>

   </channel>
</rss>

