<?xml version="1.0" encoding="us-ascii"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.cmswatch.com" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
   <channel>
      <title>CMS Watch Xerox Feed</title>
      <link>http://www.cmswatch.com</link>
      <description>CMS Watch headlines about Xerox</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue,  6 Jan 2009 05:03:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <dc:creator>editor@cmswatch.com (Tony Byrne)</dc:creator>
      <dc:rights>Copyright 2005, CMS Watch</dc:rights>
      <dc:publisher>CMS Watch</dc:publisher>
      
      <item>
         <title>The ECM Suites Report 2009 released today</title>
         <description>Today I'm proud to announce the release of the 2009 edition of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/ECM/Report&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;The ECM
Suites Report&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. Expanded out to over 400 pages, I believe this constitutes
the most comprehensive ECM product evaluation report of its kind. In this
edition we have added some new vendors, dropped some old, and revised
all 30 product reviews.&lt;/p&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
This churn reflects a vibrant and
extremely healthy global ECM market.  As we note in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/About/Press/200809ECM/&quot;&gt;today's press
release&lt;/a&gt;, there probably has never been a better time for
buyers, with a wide range of strong products to chose from, especially in the mid market.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If
there is one thing in particular this latest research has shown us, it is that
SharePoint did not (as many predicted) kill the ECM market, but rather the
ECM market has embraced SharePoint -- and we are all the better  for it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course there are some stinkers out there, and as buyer you
need to exercise caution, but we hope the advice, critiques, and &amp;quot;insider&amp;quot; detail
we provide in this report will help mitigate your risks. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As always, if you're a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Reports/Subscriptions/&quot;&gt;subscription customer&lt;/a&gt;, you'll automatically receive your copy shortly.</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1367-The-ECM-Suites-Report-2009-released-today?source=RSS</link>
         <category>ECM Suites</category>
         <author>aps@cmswatch.com(Alan Pelz-Sharpe)</author>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 00:07:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>A new edition of our ECM Suites Report</title>
         <description>Is &amp;quot;departmental enterprise content management&amp;quot; an oxymoron? We think 
  not. In fact, much of the growth in the ECM industry is serving small- to mid-sized 
  businesses and individual enterprise departments seeking to undertake basic 
  document and records management. So for those customers, we've created a new 
  (lower-cost) edition of our &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cmswatch.com/ECM/Report/&quot;&gt;ECM Suites Report&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;. The newer edition covers 
  just 15 of the 30 vendors in the full report who provide basic document collaboration 
  and/or records management (e.g. Microsoft, Xerox). That means it doesn't cover 
  the traditional enterprisey products (e.g., Documentum, Open Text), so if you're 
  considering those suppliers, you'll want the regular, enterprise edition. &lt;a href=&quot;http://cmswatch.com/images/CMS-Watch-ECMSuites-Compare.pdf&quot;&gt;This 
  short PDF chart contrasts the two editions&lt;/a&gt; and explains which one might better suit your needs. Please don't hesitate &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:info@cmswatch.com&quot;&gt;to inquire&lt;/a&gt; with any questions or comments.</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/922-A-new-edition-of-our-ECM-Suites-Report?source=RSS</link>
         <category>ECM Suites</category>
         <author>tbyrne@cmswatch.com(Tony Byrne)</author>
         <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 15:21:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Enterprise Content Management Marketplace: Opportunities and Risks</title>
         <description>Buyers looking at strategic ECM investments can find product research from CMS Watch and other analyst firms, but, Alan Pelz-Sharpe argues, you need to look beyond the tools to the vendors themselves.  And here, Alan finds that some of the biggest and well-known vendors are undergoing substantial change right now, at some near-term risk for their customers...</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Feature/162-ECM-2007?source=RSS</link>
         <category></category>
         <author>aps@cmswatch.com(Alan Pelz-Sharpe)</author>
         <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:09:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>ECM is dead - long live ECM!</title>
         <description>Alan Pelz-Sharpe returns to CMS Watch to argue that ECM as you know it is dead, but that more pragmatic approaches to managing content across the enterprise are emerging, with new -- and probably simpler -- types of tools...</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Feature/140-Whither-ECM?source=RSS</link>
         <category></category>
         <author>aps@cmswatch.com(Alan Pelz-Sharpe)</author>
         <pubDate>Wed,  7 Jun 2006 13:26:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>CMS Watch updates Records Management Report</title>
         <description>We've just released the latest edition of our &lt;i&gt;Records Management Report&lt;/i&gt;, which evaluates 25 RM vendors as of April, 2006.  In addition to product updates, we added ZyLAB and Xerox Docushare to our coverage.</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/674-CMS-Watch-updates-Records-Management-Report?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Records Management</category>
         <author>tbyrne@cmswatch.com(Tony Byrne)</author>
         <pubDate>Thu,  4 May 2006 11:04:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>RM Certification Announcements - Aren't They Special?</title>
         <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/RM/Vendors/IBM&quot;&gt;IBM&lt;/a&gt; recently &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.managinginformation.com/news/content_show_full.php?id=4276&quot;&gt;announced 
  that it was the first records management vendor to receive the TNA certification&lt;/a&gt; 
  in the UK. The more I looked into it the more I've realized there isn't anything 
  that special about the &amp;quot;new&amp;quot; TNA certification --just a different 
  name that reflects the merger of two UK government agencies into one. The certification 
  is still based on the same &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/electronicrecords/function.htm&quot;&gt;UK 
  PRO certification&lt;/a&gt; -- which the government agencies are still looking to 
  update. One thing that does look interesting is that the IBM DB2 Records Management 
  platform (i.e. the Tarian Engine) has been on a tear in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://jitc.fhu.disa.mil/recmgt/&quot;&gt;DoD 
  5015.2 certification&lt;/a&gt; area. In addition to certifications (Chapter 2 and 
  4 for the Records Manager itself) within IBM's own product line and the integration 
  with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/RM/Vendors/Xerox&quot;&gt;Xerox DocuShare&lt;/a&gt;, it recently re-certified Infolinx Systems Solution's InfolinxWeb 
  and CACI Highview Records Manager (formerly the Vredenburg product) with the 
  new version of the product. Of course, they are not alone. The Joint Interoperability 
  Test Command (JITC) -- the guys that certify software for the DoD specification 
  -- &lt;a href=&quot;http://jitc.fhu.disa.mil/recmgt/register.html&quot;&gt;have been very busy&lt;/a&gt;. 
  Other recent recertifications include &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/RM/Vendors/TOWER%20Software&quot;&gt;Tower Software TRIM Context&lt;/a&gt; (Chapter 2 
  and 4), &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/RM/Vendors/Mobius&quot;&gt;Mobius Management Systems' ViewDirect&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/RM/Vendors/Documentum%20(EMC)&quot;&gt;EMC's Documentum Records Manager&lt;/a&gt;, 
  and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/RM/Vendors/Hummingbird&quot;&gt;Hummingbird's 2005 DM/RM&lt;/a&gt; to name a few. Certifications are important but 
  not necessarily product differentiators.</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/528-RM-Certification-Announcements---Aren't-They-Special?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Records Management</category>
         <author>RM-analyst@cmswatch.com(Priscilla Emery)</author>
         <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:56:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>

   </channel>
</rss>

