<?xml version="1.0" encoding="us-ascii"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.cmswatch.com" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
   <channel>
      <title>CMS Watch Percussion Feed</title>
      <link>http://www.cmswatch.com</link>
      <description>CMS Watch headlines about Percussion</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon,  8 Sep 2008 11:41:14 -0400</lastBuildDate>
      <dc:creator>editor@cmswatch.com (Tony Byrne)</dc:creator>
      <dc:rights>Copyright 2005, CMS Watch</dc:rights>
      <dc:publisher>CMS Watch</dc:publisher>
      
      <item>
         <title>Percussion splits off Lotus business</title>
         <description>Percussion Software originally started out as a purveyor of Lotus tools. As 
  its subsequent Web CMS business grew to substantially outstrip the Lotus side, 
  those tools became a sometimes confusing appendage for prospective customers. 
  Earlier this week, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/Percussion&quot;&gt;Percussion&lt;/a&gt; 
  announced that it was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.percussion.com/news/press-releases/2007/axceler.html&quot;&gt;splitting off its Lotus products&lt;/a&gt; into an entirely separate 
  company called &amp;quot;Axceler.&amp;quot; Of course, whenever this happens, one wonders 
  if the company is preparing one part or another for an acquisition. However, 
  over the years Percussion has garnered a reputation of playing hard-to-get when 
  suitors come calling, which doubtless comes as a relief to its own customers. 
  Interestingly, with the recent revivification of IBM's Lotus platform, Percussion's (former) 
  Lotus offerings may be attracting more interest as well.</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/919-Percussion-splits-off-Lotus-business?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Web Content Management</category>
         <author>tbyrne@cmswatch.com(Tony Byrne)</author>
         <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 16:27:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>A new report on Content Component Management</title>
         <description>Today &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/About/Press/200702CCMS/&quot;&gt;we announced an alliance&lt;/a&gt; with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rockley.com&quot;&gt;The Rockley Group&lt;/a&gt; to publish a report evaluating 
  &amp;quot;Content Component Management&amp;quot; tools and practices. From today's release:
  &lt;blockquote&gt;Significant vendors in the Content Component Management space include: Astoria, 
    AuthorIT, DocZone, PTC, SiberLogic, Trisoft, Vasont, XHive, XyEnterprise, 
    Percussion, Tridion, Documentum, and Interwoven. The report will also evaluate 
    major structured authoring tools, including JustSystems XMetaL, PTC Arbortext 
    Editor, Adobe FrameMaker, Microsoft Word, and In.Vision Xpress Author.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; I'm very excited because our customers frequently ask us about this space, 
  and it seems to remain under-covered in the media/analyst community.</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/845-A-new-report-on-Content-Component-Management?source=RSS</link>
         <category>ECM Suites</category>
         <author>tbyrne@cmswatch.com(Tony Byrne)</author>
         <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 08:07:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Percussion announces enterprise-ready Rhythmyx 6</title>
         <description>CMS vendor &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/Percussion&quot;&gt;Percussion&lt;/a&gt; 
  is pitching their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.percussion.com/news/press-releases/2006/press-release-3009.html&quot;&gt;latest 
  Version 6.0 of Rhythmyx&lt;/a&gt; not so much as an ECM product solution &amp;#8211; but 
  as the core of an interoperability strategy that &lt;em&gt;enables&lt;/em&gt; ECM. This 
  seems like a smart approach for a niche solution. The company has added a WSDK 
  (Web Services Software Developer's Kit) and web services API, making it easier 
  to pull and push content into and out of the Rhythmyx repository. Percussion 
  also productized a WYSIWYG web forms tool (&amp;agrave; la &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/Ektron&quot;&gt;Ektron&lt;/a&gt;) 
  previously developed by a channel partner. That all sounds good, but Rhythmyx  V6 
  doesn't actually release until the end of July and it will be some months 
  before Percussion's customers have put it through its paces. We'll let you know...</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/714-Percussion-announces-enterprise-ready-Rhythmyx-6?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Web Content Management</category>
         <author>tregli@cmswatch.com(Theresa Regli)</author>
         <pubDate>Fri,  7 Jul 2006 11:47:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The case against canned RFI/RFPs</title>
         <description>CMS vendor &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/Percussion&quot;&gt;Percussion&lt;/a&gt; 
  is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/images/PercussionRFI-Ad.gif&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;beating 
  the drums again about its free Request for Information template&lt;/a&gt;. I have 
  one piece of advice: don't use it. Every other vendor has seen it and will think 
  the project is hardwired for Percussion. Of course, nearly every other vendor 
  also distributes their own canned RFPs, albeit more subtly. (Well, not always 
  subtle...consider the file I saw recently, titled &amp;quot;RedDot Centric RFP&amp;quot;...though 
  I guess that's being honest!) The use of canned RFPs might help explain this 
  common lament from buyers: &amp;quot;I sent an RFP to a dozen vendors and only 2 
  responded!&amp;quot; In addition to being very busy, vendors are also very suspicious. 
  So if your competition is truly open -- and it should be -- don't suggest otherwise 
  by starting with a canned template. Instead, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Feature/128-Selecting-Products&quot;&gt;challenge vendors with real narratives&lt;/a&gt;, 
  and use your own voice for your own best solution. And if you're looking to start from a good short-list, consult &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Feature/134-The-case-for-RFIs&quot;&gt;Alan Pelz-Sharpe's fine article&lt;/a&gt; on the subject.</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/579-The-case-against-canned-RFI/RFPs?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Web Content Management</category>
         <author>tbyrne@cmswatch.com(Tony Byrne)</author>
         <pubDate>Tue,  6 Dec 2005 09:25:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Rich text editor alternatives to Ektron</title>
         <description>CMS vendor &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/Ektron&quot;&gt;Ektron&lt;/a&gt; 
  started out as a WYSIWYG widget maker and pretty much made that market through 
  OEM deals with several major CMS vendors. But some customers don't want an ActiveX-based 
  solution, and rich text editors are notoriously finicky, so not every solution 
  works well within any given environment. There are many applet-based alternatives, 
  although they have had a reputation for bugginess. Now it looks like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ephox.com&quot;&gt;Ephox&lt;/a&gt; 
  is coming to lead that lot, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ephox.com/news/default.asp&quot;&gt;announcing recent OEM deals&lt;/a&gt; 
  with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/Vignette&quot;&gt;Vignette&lt;/a&gt; and 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/Percussion&quot;&gt;Percussion&lt;/a&gt;, enabling 
  those vendors to compete better in some markets (e.g. academia) where Windows 
  does not dominate the desktop. With the rise of AJAX, though, I'm seeing more 
  CMS vendors gaining confidence with DHTML+Javascript rich interfaces. So the 
  days of the thick plug-in may be numbered...</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/562-Rich-text-editor-alternatives-to-Ektron?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Web Content Management</category>
         <author>tbyrne@cmswatch.com(Tony Byrne)</author>
         <pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 15:46:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>A short tour of ECM case studies</title>
         <description>Tony Byrne reports on case studies from Vignette, Hummingbird, EMC, Stellent, and Percussion at the AIIM Solutions Seminars, and finds that much can be learned from what was said -- and not said -- at the show.</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Feature/132-AIIM-Solutions-Seminars?source=RSS</link>
         <category></category>
         <author>tbyrne@cmswatch.com(Tony Byrne)</author>
         <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 11:52:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Mid-market can mean large and small buyers alike</title>
         <description>Like many CMS vendors, Percussion is trying to make its solution more &quot;out-of-the-box.&quot;  There's a fine line to walk, there, though, as largish buyers want something easy to prototype but highly extensible for enterprise roll-out.  We're not sure whether Percussion's new offering walks that line well, but we like their description of a healthy niche in the sub-enterprise market.  Here's what they say: &quot;Rather than segmenting the mid-tier market by the size of the enterprise only, Percussion defines the mid-tier ECM market according to the unique content management needs of customers....these customers include midsize companies making strategic purchases, as well as Global 2000 corporations making tactical purchases...&quot;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.percussion.com/news/PressReleases/559.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Read about &quot;Rhythmyx FastForward&quot;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/321-Mid-market-can-mean-large-and-small-buyers-alike?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Web Content Management</category>
         <author>tbyrne@cmswatch.com(Tony Byrne)</author>
         <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Percussion releases Rhythmyx 5.6</title>
         <description>Percussion recently announced a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.percussion.com/news/PressReleases/579.htm&quot;&gt;dot-release of its Rythmyx CMS&lt;/a&gt; product.  Most of the major changes in 5.6 revolve around redressing a traditional weakness of the product: spawning and managing multiple subsites in distributed environments.  Good for them...but always test before you buy any product, especially those with &quot;new&quot; features...</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/424-Percussion-releases-Rhythmyx-5.6?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Web Content Management</category>
         <author>tbyrne@cmswatch.com(Tony Byrne)</author>
         <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2005 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Putting a CMS Behind Your Existing Website</title>
         <description>Which came first, your CMS or your website? Probably the latter. But if your 
  website employs a lot of dynamic logic, how do you preserve that investment 
  while backing it with a CMS? Although &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/472-Content-management-and-delivery?&quot;&gt;not suitable for all use cases&lt;/a&gt;, one approach 
  is to completely decouple your CMS and delivery environments. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/Percussion&quot;&gt;Percussion&lt;/a&gt; 
  has aggressively advocated this approach and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/Refresh%20Software&quot;&gt;Refresh 
  Software&lt;/a&gt; has simplified it to an extreme by handing off a populated database 
  to your web tier. Conversely, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/Ektron&quot;&gt;Ektron&lt;/a&gt; 
  has a bundled CMS and delivery architecture, but the company recently &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ektron.com/pressreleases.aspx?id=2308&quot;&gt;announced 
  that its CMS400.NET product supports multiple scripting languages&lt;/a&gt;, including 
  PHP, JSP, and ColdFusion for content delivery. Note that CMS400 still serves 
  the content at run-time, and you must modify your existing scripts to access 
  Ektron-managed items. Here's some sample PHP code for retrieving a specific 
  list index from the respository: &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;?PHP ecmListSummary (&amp;quot;MarketingNews&amp;quot;,0,1,&amp;quot;&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Title,asc&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;DateModified&amp;quot;,0,&amp;quot;&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;&amp;quot;); 
  ?&amp;gt;,&lt;/code&gt; taken from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ektron.com/manuals/cms400/developersmanual.pdf&quot;&gt;Ektron's public documentation&lt;/a&gt; (pdf).</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/485-Putting-a-CMS-Behind-Your-Existing-Website?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Web Content Management</category>
         <author>tbyrne@cmswatch.com(Tony Byrne)</author>
         <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:15:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>A Transforming Experience for Content Management?</title>
         <description>One of the traditional knocks against XML-based CMS products is the relative immaturity of XSL as a programming language.  Well, Steve Heckler of Accelebrate returns to CMS Watch to show how the forthcoming XSLT 2.0 spec may change the way we all think about processing XML documents...</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Feature/100-XSLT-2.0?source=RSS</link>
         <category></category>
         <author>steveheckler@accelebrate.com(Steve Heckler)</author>
         <pubDate>Thu,  4 Mar 2004 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Percussion Offers Workgroup Portal</title>
         <description>It's tempting for CMS vendors to develop or resell portals, too, since many of their customers lack a robust content delivery environment.  Vignette and Interwoven have done so, and now Percussion has jumped into the race -- helpfully noting that its offering is directed more at workgroups than enterprise integration.  Think of it as MS Sharepoint running on Java.  Percussion's portal offers several nice widgets for workgroups, but we should point out the significant difference between managing collaborative projects vs. the collaborative development of web content.  For the former, a collaboration portal is useful, but for the latter, you really want to focus on the native collaborative workflow capabilities of your CMS (and most of them aren't very good at it)...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.percussion.com/news/PressReleases/534.htm?home&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Find out more about Rhythmyx Express Portal&lt;/a&gt;</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/253-Percussion-Offers-Workgroup-Portal?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Enterprise Portals</category>
         <author>tbyrne@cmswatch.com(Tony Byrne)</author>
         <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2003 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Preview to a Marriage?</title>
         <description>ECM vendor Optika and WCM vendor Percussion are dating.  The former is a publicly-traded imaging firm that added workflow and DM capabilities, then recently acquired a records management company.  In a new partnership agreement with Percussion, the two companies can now cross-sell complementary capabilities to each others' clients.  Could it also presage an acquisition?  Privately-held Percussion has been courted by others, but has consistently held out for a better match.  In the meantime, analysts are urging some of the dowdier ECM vendors to pick up web CMS capabilities.  Optika's stock price has risen recently with the rest of the tech sector (after twice falling below NASDAQ's warning threshold of $1.00); if it continues to improve, Optika will be able to offer a better dowry...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.percussion.com/news/523.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Read about the partnership at Percussion.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/218-Preview-to-a-Marriage?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Web Content Management</category>
         <author>tbyrne@cmswatch.com(Tony Byrne)</author>
         <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2003 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Putting Content Delivery Metrics to Work for Content Management</title>
         <description>As faithful CMS Report readers know, many web content management products follow a loosely-coupled or completely decoupled management/delivery architecture, while others bundle content management and delivery tightly within one package.  The former camp can claim a more elegant architecture, but the latter camp, including Broadvision, Microsoft, and especially Vignette, can boast the ability to put delivery metrics (e.g. &quot;how often is this page visited?&quot;) in the hands of editors and publishers at precisely the moment that they are working on a particular set of content.  That's useful.  Now one analytics company, Buystream, has come out with a website metrics package targeted for use in CMS environments.  Users embed special tags into content during the management phase that are picked up by the analytics package at delivery time to help decode and report how that content is being used.  Buystream presently integrates with two management-only CMS vendors, Percussion and RedDot...&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.buystream.com/products/perspective.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Find out more about Buystream's &quot;Perspective&quot; Product&lt;/a&gt;</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/187-Putting-Content-Delivery-Metrics-to-Work-for-Content-Management?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Web Content Management</category>
         <author>tbyrne@cmswatch.com(Tony Byrne)</author>
         <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2003 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>XML is Just a Means to an End (episode 39 of 63)</title>
         <description>Getting your content into XML is just the half of it, if even that.  Many enterprises confuse XML authoring and editing with the actual &lt;i&gt;management&lt;/i&gt; of usefully structured content and reusable chunks.  Chad Dickerson, CIO of InfoWorld, recently had to migrate their site from eBT's old Dynabase to Percussion (both CMS packages are XML-based).  He points out that XML has been as &quot;abused, neglected, and misunderstood&quot; as nearly every other enterprise technology.  Specifically, according to Dickerson, it's extremely hard to &quot;maintain the semantic integrity of the data represented in your XML as your business morphs and changes...&quot;  Meaningful structure takes work, throughout a content lifecycle...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/02/10/06connection_1.html?s=cto&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Read Dickerson's piece, &quot;Heaven of XM-hell?&quot;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/183-XML-is-Just-a-Means-to-an-End-(episode-39-of-63)?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Web Content Management</category>
         <author>tbyrne@cmswatch.com(Tony Byrne)</author>
         <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2003 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Public boasting, private financials</title>
         <description>This is the time of year when CMS vendors start crowing (or eating crow) about their 4th Quarter results.  Some of the most boastful pronouncements typically emanate from privately-held firms, who can avoid the inconvenience of publishing real financials in an openly-accessible manner the way most major bourses require of public companies.  We would tend to agree that -- especially compared to their larger competitors -- many private CMS vendors appear to be doing well, but well enough to still stay afloat?  When you get deep into the software selection process (read: contract negotiations) with them, private companies will disclose some nuggets of information, perhaps even audited financial statements.  They know that for many buyers, it can be emotionally too late to withdraw an intent to purchase based on, say, a sickly balance sheet.  Below you can find out about some private CMS vendors' Q4 results.  But in our opinion, you'd be wasting your time...&lt;br /&gt;  


&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fatwire.com/news/pressrelease.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;FatWire&lt;/a&gt; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;  
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paperthin.com/News/PaperThin-Announces-New-Healthcare-Customers.cfm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;PaperThin&lt;/a&gt; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.percussion.com/news/506.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Percussion&lt;/a&gt; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tridion.com/com/news/pressreleases/fr2002.asp&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Tridion&lt;/a&gt;</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/173-Public-boasting,-private-financials?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Web Content Management</category>
         <author>tbyrne@cmswatch.com(Tony Byrne)</author>
         <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2003 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Witness to a CMS Implementation</title>
         <description>When we last &lt;a href=&quot;/Features/PeopleWatch/FeaturedPeople/?feature_id=46&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;profiled NetworkWorld Fusion editor Adam Gaffin&lt;/a&gt;, his team was just selecting a new CMS package.  Now Gaffin is chronicling the actual implementation through a very promising blog.  His comments about the package NW selected (Percussion's Rhythmyx) could apply to most other products.  Note especially Gaffin's discussion of the complexities of expiring content in state-transition workflows, as well as his critique of the templating system.  On the latter, we must agree that one of the negative side-effects of most CMS implementations is the reinsertion of an engineer in between a designer and their templates...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://napps.nwfusion.com/weblogs/content/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Check out Gaffin's Blog&lt;/a&gt;</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/141-Witness-to-a-CMS-Implementation?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Web Content Management</category>
         <author>tbyrne@cmswatch.com(Tony Byrne)</author>
         <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2002 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>

   </channel>
</rss>

