<?xml version="1.0" encoding="us-ascii"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.cmswatch.com" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
   <channel>
      <title>CMS Watch Mobius Feed</title>
      <link>http://www.cmswatch.com</link>
      <description>CMS Watch headlines about Mobius</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue,  6 Jan 2009 01:03:40 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <dc:creator>editor@cmswatch.com (Tony Byrne)</dc:creator>
      <dc:rights>Copyright 2005, CMS Watch</dc:rights>
      <dc:publisher>CMS Watch</dc:publisher>
      
      <item>
         <title>RM Certification Announcements - Aren't They Special?</title>
         <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/RM/Vendors/IBM&quot;&gt;IBM&lt;/a&gt; recently &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.managinginformation.com/news/content_show_full.php?id=4276&quot;&gt;announced 
  that it was the first records management vendor to receive the TNA certification&lt;/a&gt; 
  in the UK. The more I looked into it the more I've realized there isn't anything 
  that special about the &amp;quot;new&amp;quot; TNA certification --just a different 
  name that reflects the merger of two UK government agencies into one. The certification 
  is still based on the same &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/electronicrecords/function.htm&quot;&gt;UK 
  PRO certification&lt;/a&gt; -- which the government agencies are still looking to 
  update. One thing that does look interesting is that the IBM DB2 Records Management 
  platform (i.e. the Tarian Engine) has been on a tear in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://jitc.fhu.disa.mil/recmgt/&quot;&gt;DoD 
  5015.2 certification&lt;/a&gt; area. In addition to certifications (Chapter 2 and 
  4 for the Records Manager itself) within IBM's own product line and the integration 
  with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/RM/Vendors/Xerox&quot;&gt;Xerox DocuShare&lt;/a&gt;, it recently re-certified Infolinx Systems Solution's InfolinxWeb 
  and CACI Highview Records Manager (formerly the Vredenburg product) with the 
  new version of the product. Of course, they are not alone. The Joint Interoperability 
  Test Command (JITC) -- the guys that certify software for the DoD specification 
  -- &lt;a href=&quot;http://jitc.fhu.disa.mil/recmgt/register.html&quot;&gt;have been very busy&lt;/a&gt;. 
  Other recent recertifications include &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/RM/Vendors/TOWER%20Software&quot;&gt;Tower Software TRIM Context&lt;/a&gt; (Chapter 2 
  and 4), &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/RM/Vendors/Mobius&quot;&gt;Mobius Management Systems' ViewDirect&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/RM/Vendors/Documentum%20(EMC)&quot;&gt;EMC's Documentum Records Manager&lt;/a&gt;, 
  and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/RM/Vendors/Hummingbird&quot;&gt;Hummingbird's 2005 DM/RM&lt;/a&gt; to name a few. Certifications are important but 
  not necessarily product differentiators.</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/528-RM-Certification-Announcements---Aren't-They-Special?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Records Management</category>
         <author>RM-analyst@cmswatch.com(Priscilla Emery)</author>
         <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:56:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>

   </channel>
</rss>

