<?xml version="1.0" encoding="us-ascii"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.cmswatch.com" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
   <channel>
      <title>CMS Watch MediaWiki Feed</title>
      <link>http://www.cmswatch.com</link>
      <description>CMS Watch headlines about MediaWiki</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:40:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <dc:creator>editor@cmswatch.com (Tony Byrne)</dc:creator>
      <dc:rights>Copyright 2005, CMS Watch</dc:rights>
      <dc:publisher>CMS Watch</dc:publisher>
      
      <item>
         <title>When a Wiki package gets too real</title>
         <description>In talking to wiki users, we find a wide range of sophistication. Some are 
  quite content with the simplistic &amp;quot;edit this page&amp;quot; features you can 
  now find in most &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/&quot;&gt;Web CMS&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Social/&quot;&gt;Social 
  Software&lt;/a&gt; suites, while other customers seek more advanced features (such 
  as topical refactoring and advanced aggregation and print services) that constitute 
  for them a &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; wiki.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And then there are those who cut their teeth editing Wikipedia pages or learned 
  about wikis by using the earliest tools. They come with a particular set of 
  expectations -- especially around using good old fashioned &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikitext&quot;&gt;Wikitext&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; 
  mark-up -- that today are met largely through the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Social/Vendors/MediaWiki&quot;&gt;MediaWiki&lt;/a&gt; platform, the same 
  tool that powers Wikipedia. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Social/Report/&quot;&gt;Enterprise Social Software 
  Report&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; readers know, MediaWiki tends to find favor among wiki purists, 
  but is often perceived as too arcane by novice users. Here's a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.quis.com/2008/07/16/why-mediawiki-is-not-the-right-wiki-product-for-my-clients&quot;&gt;nice 
  summary of some relevant issues by consultant Dan Katz&lt;/a&gt;. (Thanks to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Analyst/8-Boye&quot;&gt;Janus&lt;/a&gt; 
  for the link.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; I'm more sanguine about open source wiki options and less enthusiastic about 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Social/Vendors/Socialtext&quot;&gt;Socialtext&lt;/a&gt; than 
  Katz, but he makes some very good points regardless of the tool you select. 
  The key for you the customer is, as always, to test with &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; users 
  before you deploy... </description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1315-When-a-Wiki-package-gets-too-real?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Enterprise Social Software</category>
         <author>tbyrne@cmswatch.com(Tony Byrne)</author>
         <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:46:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Announcing the Enterprise Social Software Report 2008</title>
         <description>The full name is actually &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Social/Report/&quot;&gt;Enterprise Social Software Report 2008: Networking 
  &amp;amp; Collaboration Within and Beyond the Enterprise&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;. Enterprises are increasingly 
  using social tools -- some new, some not so new -- within and beyond enterprise boundaries.  As one side effect, those boundaries are increasingly blurring, even though
  vendors still find it difficult to satisfy both internal and external scenarios.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The report evaluates &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Social/Vendors/&quot;&gt;20 Social 
  Software vendors&lt;/a&gt; against eleven common scenarions, weighing in at about 400 pages. Turns out there are a 
  lot of differences among vendors and approaches. The tools may espouse a light 
  touch, but many of the architectures are far from trivial. Our &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/About/Press/200806ESSR/&quot;&gt;media release today 
  highlights just one potential challenge&lt;/a&gt; you may face implementing at an enterprise 
  level: the general dearth of system services (like configuration management) 
  across this space. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The report is &lt;a href=&quot;http://cmsworks.stores.yahoo.net/essr.html&quot;&gt;available for pre-order&lt;/a&gt; today. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Reports/Subscriptions/&quot;&gt;Subscribers&lt;/a&gt; will receive their 
  copy in a week or so when the official version gets burned out.</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1270-Announcing-the-Enterprise-Social-Software-Report-2008?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Enterprise Social Software</category>
         <author>tbyrne@cmswatch.com(Tony Byrne)</author>
         <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>

   </channel>
</rss>

