<?xml version="1.0" encoding="us-ascii"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.cmswatch.com" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
   <channel>
      <title>CMS Watch Immediacy Feed</title>
      <link>http://www.cmswatch.com</link>
      <description>CMS Watch headlines about Immediacy</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:31:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <dc:creator>editor@cmswatch.com (Tony Byrne)</dc:creator>
      <dc:rights>Copyright 2005, CMS Watch</dc:rights>
      <dc:publisher>CMS Watch</dc:publisher>
      
      <item>
         <title>Mediasurface and The Three Bears</title>
         <description>UK-based Web CMS vendor &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/Mediasurface&quot;&gt;Mediasurface&lt;/a&gt; announced today &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mediasurface.com/news/immediacy-acquisition/&quot;&gt;its intention to acquire&lt;/a&gt; 
  smaller UK competitor &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/Immediacy&quot;&gt;Immediacy&lt;/a&gt;. This follows a 2005 acquisition of a hosted Dutch 
  solution that Mediasurface renamed &amp;quot;Pepperio,&amp;quot; to target small businesses. 
  I &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/423-Mediasurface-acquires-a-second-CMS&quot;&gt;wasn't sanguine at the time about one vendor selling two products&lt;/a&gt; and I don't 
  see how three offerings makes the company any stronger, even if it gets bigger.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To its credit, Mediasurface has dispensed with the usual bromides about &amp;quot;synergies&amp;quot; 
  and offers a fairly straightforward rationale for adding a mid-range solution 
  to it's current high / low set: Mediasurface salespeople can now sell Goldilocks 
  a small, medium, or large solution. As &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Report/&quot;&gt;Web CMS Report&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; readers know, 
  Immediacy's underlying technology differs quite substantially from Mediasurface's 
  flagship Morello tool. The two companies also exhibit quite distinct cultures, 
  although I think Mediasurface will absorb its new family member quite quickly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/images/3bearsNewSmall.jpg&quot; width=&quot;400&quot; height=&quot;226&quot; alt=&quot;Mediasurface's three bears&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because you see, the acquisition was pretty much an all-cash deal (&amp;pound;5.6m), 
  to be paid by &lt;a href=&quot;http://sitecontent.mediasurface.com/uk-en/documents/pdfs/financial/immediacy-acquisition.pdf&quot;&gt;a Mediasurface supplemental stock offering&lt;/a&gt; (pdf). Seems like Immediacy's 
  owners are cashing out rather than hanging in. So to the extent there are any 
  risks here, I suspect they will fall to Immediacy customers and Mediasurface 
  stockholders. Too early to tell if those two groups will find themselves brothers 
  grim. For you the prospective customer, you'll need to decide whether getting 
  a tool that's &amp;quot;just right&amp;quot; for your size is worth the downside of 
  working with a vendor that must enhance and support three different products.</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/953-Mediasurface-and-The-Three-Bears?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Web Content Management</category>
         <author>tbyrne@cmswatch.com(Tony Byrne)</author>
         <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:15:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Marketplace Realities: A European Perspective</title>
         <description>Janus Boye examines the content technology landscape from the perspective of a European customer, and finds much of concern (beta software, inexperience, confusing terminology), but much to laud (better accessibility, widespread choice) as well...</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Feature/155-European-Market?source=RSS</link>
         <category></category>
         <author>jb@boyeit.dk(Janus Boye)</author>
         <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:06:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>CMS vendor Immediacy announces document management system</title>
         <description>In &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbronline.com/article_feature.asp?guid=10D5A0A9-0A0B-459A-9BC0-18F1BA6FC222&quot;&gt;recent 
news&lt;/a&gt; the UK-based Web CMS vendor &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/Immediacy&quot;&gt;Immediacy&lt;/a&gt; 
began trumpeting a new lightweight document management system (DMS) add-on. As 
readers of the &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Report/&quot;&gt;CMS Report, European 
Edition&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt; know, Immediacy offers basic, MS SharePoint-like functionality 
to manage Office documents. Other Web CMS vendors have been adding lightweight 
document management capabilities as well, and for some customers, it makes sense. 
Immediacy doubtless wants to make it easier for smaller UK government organizations 
to use them as their sole vendor, without the need to invest in third-party document 
management systems. That might work for some, but buyers should remember, that 
there is no &quot;One Ring To Rule Them All.&amp;quot; It is already difficult or impossible 
to find one CMS well-suited for the multiple scenarios in your enterprise. In 
our research we found Immediacy a decent fit for only three out of our &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Feature/153-Selecting-CMS-Tools&quot;&gt;twelve 
scenarios&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/800-CMS-vendor-Immediacy-announces-document-management-system?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Web Content Management</category>
         <author>info@jboye.dk(Janus Boye)</author>
         <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 04:52:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>We release version 10 of The CMS Report</title>
         <description>Our quest to tell the real story about web content management 
  software continues today. In this latest edition of &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Report/&quot;&gt;The 
  CMS Report&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;/em&gt;we've updated all the vendor reviews and added some new 
  evaluation criteria, including system reporting, micro-applications, and content 
  retention -- addressing the increasingly important role of marketers and records 
  managers. With this version, we also make available an optional &amp;quot;European Edition,&amp;quot; 
  which adds several new vendors active primarily in that region (Escenic, e-Spirit, 
  eZ publish, GOSS, Immediacy, and Terminalfour). In North America, we begin coverage 
  of Hot Banana and Hannon Hill.
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Reports/Try/&quot;&gt;Sample the report&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://store.yahoo.com/cmsworks/cmswatchreport.html&quot;&gt;Buy the report now&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
As always, &lt;i&gt;CMS Report&lt;/i&gt; buyers within the past 10 weeks will receive the new version 
gratis. Previous CMS Watch customers are eligible for discounted updates. Look for 
an e-mail shortly.</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/743-We-release-version-10-of-The-CMS-Report?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Web Content Management</category>
         <author>tbyrne@cmswatch.com(Tony Byrne)</author>
         <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 00:01:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>

   </channel>
</rss>

