<?xml version="1.0" encoding="us-ascii"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.cmswatch.com" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
   <channel>
      <title>CMS Watch Hippo Feed</title>
      <link>http://www.cmswatch.com</link>
      <description>CMS Watch headlines about Hippo</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:31:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <dc:creator>editor@cmswatch.com (Tony Byrne)</dc:creator>
      <dc:rights>Copyright 2005, CMS Watch</dc:rights>
      <dc:publisher>CMS Watch</dc:publisher>
      
      <item>
         <title>Web Idol 2008</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;Here at &lt;a href=&quot;http://jboye08.dk&quot;&gt;J. Boye 2008&lt;/a&gt; in Denmark, yesterday we held the 3rd-annual Web Idol, where    five vendors got seven minutes each to demo their wares and get critiqued    by a set of judges (myself included). Ultimately, the audience voted the winner.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The general crowd consensus was that this set of demos were less interesting    and polished than previous years. But I thought the choices vendors made about    what to show were revealing. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/Sitecore&quot;&gt;Sitecore&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/eZ%20Systems&quot;&gt;eZ publish&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/Tridion/&quot;&gt;SDL Tridion&lt;/a&gt; all demonstrated    rather feature-rich (and daunting) &amp;quot;power-user&amp;quot; interfaces. We see    this a lot in demos: vendors trying to appeal to the most sophisticated users    in the room -- who presumably are decisive in the final selection. But do you    want the most powerful system, or the easiest to use? Different stakeholders    are going to have different answers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All five vendors (including &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/Hippo/&quot;&gt;Hippo&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/e-Spirit&quot;&gt;e-Spirit&lt;/a&gt;) emphasized &lt;em&gt;website&lt;/em&gt;    management over basic content/information management. This follows &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/About/Press/200710WEBMGR/&quot;&gt;an important    trend&lt;/a&gt; in the industry, but still left some of the audience wondering a bit about    how the workaday business contributor would simply edit a single page.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So who won the election? It was close, but no re-count necessary, with    the Danish &amp;quot;home team&amp;quot; vendor, Sitecore winning the day.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1417-Web-Idol-2008?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Web Content Management</category>
         <author>tbyrne@cmswatch.com(Tony Byrne)</author>
         <pubDate>Thu,  6 Nov 2008 10:39:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Web CMS Thoughts from Gilbane Day One</title>
         <description>After participating in the first day of the Gilbane San Francisco conference yesterday, 
   here some short observations in no particular order.&lt;/p&gt;
  
&lt;ul&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;By my count, once-little &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/Ektron/&quot;&gt;Ektron&lt;/a&gt; 
    has seen four years of hyper-growth. The company says they now have 200 employees. 
    If accurate, I'll guess this head-count puts them at about US$30-40m in revenues, 
    which sizes Ektron in the ball-park of some of the larger standalone Web CMS 
    vendors (like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/FatWire/&quot;&gt;FatWire&lt;/a&gt;, 
    or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/Tridion/&quot;&gt;Tridion&lt;/a&gt; before 
    the SDL acquisition), or even the CMS product groups of some larger vendors. You're probably not surprised to hear that Ektron customers tell us this growth has not come without associated growth pains.  
  &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Forrester analyst &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forrester.com/rb/analyst/rob_koplowitz&quot;&gt;Rob Koplowitz&lt;/a&gt;, who once worked on SharePoint Portal Server 
    2003 at Microsoft, called the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/SharePoint/&quot;&gt;MOSS 
    2007&lt;/a&gt; platform a &amp;quot;collection of festering boils.&amp;quot; You can ask 
    him for clarification, but he seems to have meant it with love...&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Speaking of SharePoint, two channel partners told me that their local Microsoft 
    reps were marketing MOSS for public websites really hard. Evidently Redmond 
    wants to beat &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/About/Press/200704MOSS/&quot;&gt;the rap that the tool is not ideal for public-facing sites&lt;/a&gt;, and doubtless 
    would like to lengthen &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.msdn.com/angus_logan/archive/2007/06/15/websites-built-on-moss-2007.aspx&quot;&gt;this customer list.&lt;/a&gt; So the integrators are asking themselves, 
    &amp;quot;when Microsoft hands us a great lead to follow, how can we have a candid 
    conversation with the prospect about their real alternatives?&amp;quot; Not a 
    new story in the channel business, but a pressing one right now, and you the buyer should understand 
    the institutional dynamics. See, this presents you a bit of a dilemma as well: 
    ideally you'd find a vendor-neutral consultant to help you sort out your choices, 
    but if MOSS wins your competition in the end, you really want to go with a 
    partner who brings very deep skills in Web Publishing in SharePoint, because 
    it's not a simple beast. If Redmond keeps pushing its partners, then &amp;quot;vendor 
    neutral with very deep SharePoint skills&amp;quot; could become an oxymoron. &lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;If the exhibit hall is any indication, the Web CMS marketplace continues 
    to expand, especially at the lower end -- perhaps dispelling the myth of a 
    SharePoint steamroller, at least in this space. Smaller vendors here -- some 
    of whom have participated for multiple events now -- include &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.acumium.com&quot;&gt;Acumium&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bridgelinesw.com&quot;&gt;Bridgeline&lt;/a&gt;, 
    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.broadchoice.com&quot;&gt;Broadchoice&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/Hippo&quot;&gt;Hippo&lt;/a&gt;, 
    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telerik.com&quot;&gt;Telerik&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thelevel.com&quot;&gt;The Level&lt;/a&gt;, plus many of the other usual suspects we cover in 
    our &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Report/&quot;&gt;Web CMS Report 2008&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course, exhibitors come and go from year to year. One thing doesn't change 
  though. Despite all the talk about Web 2.0, a lot of customers bring some very 
  basic questions they want addressed about web publishing and CMS tools. I hope 
  I can answer some of them at my tutorial tomorrow.</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1278-Web-CMS-Thoughts-from-Gilbane-Day-One?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Web Content Management</category>
         <author>tbyrne@cmswatch.com(Tony Byrne)</author>
         <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:48:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Web CMS Scene in Europe</title>
         <description>The fragmentation of the global Web Content Management technology space continues 
  unabated, although we see significant regional differences. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In Europe, the small and mid-sized Web CMS vendors continue to grow and innovate. 
  Honestly, we have to hustle to keep up with them, which means it must be a bit 
  dizzying for you the buyer as well. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With our latest edition of &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Report&quot;&gt;The Web CMS Report&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; we add two new European 
  vendors to our evaluations: Dutch commercial open source vendor &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/Hippo/&quot;&gt;Hippo&lt;/a&gt;, and the 
  Icelandic-UK mash-up, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/Vyre/&quot;&gt;Vyre&lt;/a&gt;. (No lack for interesting names...) Both vendors 
  face some difficult challenges in the coming year, but both have established 
  a decent reputation and customer base to draw upon as well. We'll keep watching -- and explaining...</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1177-The-Web-CMS-Scene-in-Europe?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Web Content Management</category>
         <author>tbyrne@cmswatch.com(Tony Byrne)</author>
         <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:53:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>

   </channel>
</rss>

