<?xml version="1.0" encoding="us-ascii"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.cmswatch.com" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
   <channel>
      <title>CMS Watch HannonHill Feed</title>
      <link>http://www.cmswatch.com</link>
      <description>CMS Watch headlines about HannonHill</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed,  3 Dec 2008 19:57:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <dc:creator>editor@cmswatch.com (Tony Byrne)</dc:creator>
      <dc:rights>Copyright 2005, CMS Watch</dc:rights>
      <dc:publisher>CMS Watch</dc:publisher>
      
      <item>
         <title>Decoupled Web CMS vendors have not disappeared</title>
         <description>Over the past two years, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/&quot;&gt;Web 
  Content Management vendors&lt;/a&gt; have fallen over themselves to provide more interactive 
  services on the front ends of websites, closely tied into traditional content 
  production services on the authoring side. Put another way: in an attempt to 
  appeal to the ever-alluring (but often elusive) web marketing manager, CMS vendors 
  are increasingly binding &lt;em&gt;website&lt;/em&gt; management to content management. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Even &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/Percussion&quot;&gt;Percussion&lt;/a&gt; 
  -- onetime stalwart defender of the decoupled approach, advocate for flexible 
  delivery environments, and ardent supporter of the website developer working 
  separately from content people -- now &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.percussion.com/solutions/personalization-segmentation/&quot;&gt;talks 
  avidly of combining content and interaction management&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At one level this all makes sense. You want to obviate the need for pervasive 
  IT support for interactive websites. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But I'm also noticing a certain subset of customers feeling quite left out. 
  Those who want a Web CMS that won't dictate (or interfere with) their delivery 
  environment are becoming chagrined by constricting choices in the marketplace. 
  They look around and see the likes of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/Tridion&quot;&gt;SDL 
  Tridion&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/Interwoven&quot;&gt;Interwoven&lt;/a&gt;, 
  and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/RedDot%20Solutions&quot;&gt;RedDot&lt;/a&gt; 
  (all traditionally decoupled systems) placing increasing emphasis on marketing 
  applications and Web 2.0-style interactive services.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So it's worth noting that some established Web CMS vendors continue to buck 
  the trend, including &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/Refresh%20Software&quot;&gt;Refresh 
  Software&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/HannonHill&quot;&gt;Hannon 
  Hill&lt;/a&gt;. As &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Report/&quot;&gt;Web CMS Report&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; 
  readers know, Refresh Software appears headed in a newish direction though, 
  towards DITA and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CCM/&quot;&gt;component content management&lt;/a&gt;. 
  Hannon Hill is more interesting, because they tout their unfashionable avoidance 
  of interactive marketing with great pride. They argue that their higher education 
  and government customer bases prefer simpler systems that &amp;quot;bake&amp;quot; static 
  pages. SaaS provider &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/OmniUpdate&quot;&gt;OmniUpdate&lt;/a&gt; 
  -- also decoupled -- makes the same argument. I suspect it's true.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To be sure, it's possible to embed dynamic logic in any of those systems for 
  an interactive experience on the front end, but then previewing pages means 
  the hassle of pushing content to a staging environment first. And perhaps more 
  importantly, non-coders have no control over interactivity. So, there are trade-offs 
  to the decoupled approach, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Feature/91-The-GRUPA-Gremlin&quot;&gt;advantages&lt;/a&gt; 
  as well. The good news is, you still have choices.</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1363-Decoupled-Web-CMS-vendors-have-not-disappeared?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Web Content Management</category>
         <author>tbyrne@cmswatch.com(Tony Byrne)</author>
         <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 17:44:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Content Management heads to college</title>
         <description>In the spirit of &quot;back to school,&quot; it seems timely to mention the increasing number of colleges and universities investing in content management. That may be because so many colleges are at the same time in redesign mode, transitioning their web sites from simple information centers to ones that allow students to register for classes or buy something from the book store. This requires a shift from simple brochureware sites to ones that can handle ecommerce and complex scheduling and registration, which usually signals the need for software to better manage site content. Singaporean consultancy PebbleRoad recently &lt;a
href=&quot;http://www.pebbleroad.com/article/the_changing_face_of_university_websites/&quot;&gt;evaluated 25 university web sites&lt;/a&gt; in the UK, Australia and the US, pointing out that few are up to 
snuff in the realms of accessibility or consistent branding and messaging. A few WCMS vendors pitch their products as a means to correct those problems, but we caution that technology is never the answer to problems of governance and process, be they at a Fortune 500 company or an Ivy League. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/HannonHill&quot;&gt;Hannon Hill&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/Serena%20Software&quot;&gt;Serena&lt;/a&gt;, which frequently compete against each other for business in the SMB WCMS market, have each added higher ed clients in recent months; Hannon Hill boasted 26 in the first half of 2006 alone. Look for reviews of both vendors' tools in the latest edition of the CMS Report, out later this week.</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/741-Content-Management-heads-to-college?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Web Content Management</category>
         <author>tregli@cmswatch.com(Theresa Regli)</author>
         <pubDate>Sat,  2 Sep 2006 14:50:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>I want my CMS TV?</title>
         <description>Earlier this week CMS vendor &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/HannonHill&quot;&gt;Hannon 
Hill&lt;/a&gt; announced the launch of &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmstube.com/&quot;&gt;CMS Tube&lt;/a&gt;,&quot; 
a site providing video and podcasts about their product, Cascade Server. The idea 
is to help current and prospective customers learn more about the product via 
demos, training and education, with commentary and discussions with other users 
as well. Similar resources have also sprung up around open source projects, such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://dudertown.com/howto_classes&quot;&gt;Drupal&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://plone.org/about/movies&quot;&gt;Plone&lt;/a&gt;. But Hannon Hill, a smallish company of just over 30 employees, hired 
a media producer to run CMS Tube. I'm not surprised by this, however, given a 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/799-It's-mostly-about-you:-the-lure-of-customer-conferences&quot;&gt;growing 
trend towards building user communities&lt;/a&gt;, but at first blush, this site is 
all one-way: no comments, no tags, no user-uploaded media. Also, video is scant 
substitute for being able to reach a real person when you need one, so don't consider 
VendorTube a substitute for your support contract, but it can provide a useful 
supplement.</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/831-I-want-my-CMS-TV?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Web Content Management</category>
         <author>tregli@cmswatch.com(Theresa Regli)</author>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 21:33:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>We release version 10 of The CMS Report</title>
         <description>Our quest to tell the real story about web content management 
  software continues today. In this latest edition of &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Report/&quot;&gt;The 
  CMS Report&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;/em&gt;we've updated all the vendor reviews and added some new 
  evaluation criteria, including system reporting, micro-applications, and content 
  retention -- addressing the increasingly important role of marketers and records 
  managers. With this version, we also make available an optional &amp;quot;European Edition,&amp;quot; 
  which adds several new vendors active primarily in that region (Escenic, e-Spirit, 
  eZ publish, GOSS, Immediacy, and Terminalfour). In North America, we begin coverage 
  of Hot Banana and Hannon Hill.
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Reports/Try/&quot;&gt;Sample the report&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://store.yahoo.com/cmsworks/cmswatchreport.html&quot;&gt;Buy the report now&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
As always, &lt;i&gt;CMS Report&lt;/i&gt; buyers within the past 10 weeks will receive the new version 
gratis. Previous CMS Watch customers are eligible for discounted updates. Look for 
an e-mail shortly.</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/743-We-release-version-10-of-The-CMS-Report?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Web Content Management</category>
         <author>tbyrne@cmswatch.com(Tony Byrne)</author>
         <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 00:01:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>GlobalSCAPE discontinues PureCMS</title>
         <description>GlobalSCAPE &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.globalscape.com/purecms/index.asp&quot;&gt;discontinued 
  it's low-cost CMS offering, PureCMS&lt;/a&gt; last month. That's a little sad. The 
  company cited &amp;quot;the evolving web content management market.&amp;quot; Presumably 
  that means that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/Macromedia&quot;&gt;Macromedia 
  Contribute&lt;/a&gt; was locking up the market for the kind of file-based content 
  management &lt;em&gt;sans&lt;/em&gt; workflow that PureCMS targeted. GlobalSCAPE is encouraging 
  its PureCMS customers to upgrade to its &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.globalscape.com/publishxml/&quot;&gt;PublishXML&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; 
  product, but that's a much more complex package for developers and authors alike. 
  Incidentally, both products were developed by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hannonhill.com&quot;&gt;Hannon 
  Hill&lt;/a&gt; (a Georgia, USA-based CMS company), and re-sold by GlobalSCAPE.  Meanwhile, GlobalSCAPE's core &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bizjournals.com/sanantonio/stories/2005/08/01/daily10.html&quot;&gt;file-transfer tools seem to be doing well&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/489-GlobalSCAPE-discontinues-PureCMS?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Web Content Management</category>
         <author>tbyrne@cmswatch.com(Tony Byrne)</author>
         <pubDate>Tue,  2 Aug 2005 17:27:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>

   </channel>
</rss>

