<?xml version="1.0" encoding="us-ascii"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.cmswatch.com" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
   <channel>
      <title>CMS Watch Foviance Feed</title>
      <link>http://www.cmswatch.com</link>
      <description>CMS Watch headlines about Foviance</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 18:39:19 -0400</lastBuildDate>
      <dc:creator>editor@cmswatch.com (Tony Byrne)</dc:creator>
      <dc:rights>Copyright 2005, CMS Watch</dc:rights>
      <dc:publisher>CMS Watch</dc:publisher>
      
      <item>
         <title>Yahoo! steps into analytics with IndexTools acquisition</title>
         <description>This past week's announcement that &lt;a href=&quot;http://yhoo.client.shareholder.com/press/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=303872&quot;&gt;Yahoo! 
  purchased IndexTools&lt;/a&gt; puts a new spotlight on the web analytics marketplace. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yahoo! is clearly looking to compete with Google, but the reasons for this 
  particular acquisition remain less evident. On the one hand, Yahoo! may be assuming 
  that the mass market wants the kind of richer features that IndexTools offers. 
  As you raise your own level of analytics competence, you may prove them right. 
  On the other hand, since there were only a handful of independent, mid-range 
  analytics vendors available out there for a decent price, IndexTools may have 
  come to Yahoo! via more of a process of elimination.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Yahoo! &amp;quot;party line&amp;quot; is that the technology will be a great boon 
  to its small and mid-sized business (SMB) clientele. Probably true. In many 
  ways, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Analytics/Vendors/Indextools&quot;&gt;IndexTools&lt;/a&gt; 
  resembles &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Analytics/Vendors/Google&quot;&gt;Google 
  Analytics&lt;/a&gt; in its usable interface, featuring both dynamic drilldown and 
  behavioral segmentation, as well as a nice collection of out-of-the-box reports 
  oriented towards campaign analysis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, it is the perceived potential of IndexTools that has many observers 
  hoping for more than just another Google Analytics. The company has been touting 
  its next generation release, called &amp;quot;Rubix,&amp;quot; since January. If Rubix 
  lives up to its promise, it could possibly give &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Analytics/Vendors/Omniture&quot;&gt;Omniture's&lt;/a&gt; 
  Discover offering a run in terms of functionality and ease of use. This has 
  become the second-most anticipated non-release of a product in web analytics 
  -- after Microsoft's Gatineau.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While Rubix could be a differentiator, without it, IndexTools does not offer 
  the functionality that distinguishes it from Omniture and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Analytics/Vendors/WebTrends&quot;&gt;WebTrends&lt;/a&gt; 
  -- for example the ability to analyze unaggregated data from a graphic UI and 
  to perform repeatable Excel reporting. For now, you must use regular expressions 
  to analyze unaggregated data and do manual updates of Excel...just like Google 
  Analytics.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dennis Mortenson, COO of IndexTools, claimed repeatedly that IndexTools could 
  do 80 percent of what Omniture could do, at a fraction of the price. People 
  also say the same about Google Analytics. This is marketing spin at its best. 
  It doesn't matter which 80 percent or which 20 percent; it matters only how 
  it matches your requirements.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Analytics/Report/&quot;&gt;Web Analytics Report&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; 
  readers know, larger IndexTools customers picked that solution to get good standard 
  reports, plus additional reports customized by the vendor, all at an attractive 
  price. Feature richness and attention to individual customer service are not 
  traditionally the hallmark of mass-market solutions, so Yahoo! has some clear 
  choices ahead here, and IndexTools customers will want to watch carefully which 
  way the new owner takes the service.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Among the questions that remain to be answered:. Will Rubix ever see the light 
  of day? Will the basic technology be morphed to a Google Analytics-type solution? 
  A combination of the two perhaps? Or will all of this become moot if Microsoft 
  acquires Yahoo!? Or perhaps IndexTools becomes the premier analytics offering 
  from Microsoft?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We'll be watching.</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1208-Yahoo!-steps-into-analytics-with-IndexTools-acquisition?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Web Analytics</category>
         <author>philkemelor@pkwc.com(Phil Kemelor)</author>
         <pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 10:06:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>

   </channel>
</rss>

