Get the real story via our monthly newsletter

Search

    4
    0

rss

Send to a colleague

Home > About > Press > Enterprise Search Vendors Evolving Faster Than Search Products

Get a Free Sample

Wondering about CMS Watch research? Sign up to receive free samples of any of our products.

Report Excerpt

The XML & Component Content Management Report 2008 looks at...

"If vision is one side of the vendor's organizational coin, then execution is the other. Buyers tell us they want stability and predictability from their software suppliers. In a fast-moving marketplace, that can be hard to find..."

(p. 49)

More about The XML & Component Content Management Report 2008

 
FOR RELEASE: 18 February, 2008

CONTACT:
Kristie Hughes, Marketing Director, CMS Watch
Tel: +1 202 966 6999; E-Mail Kristie

ENTERPRISE SEARCH VENDORS EVOLVING FASTER THAN SEARCH PRODUCTS
CMS Watch finds vendors experiencing rapid change, while many products remain in stasis or maintenance mode despite marketing hype


LAS VEGAS, NEVADA, USA and THE HAGUE, THE NETHERLANDS -- CMS Watch, an independent and buyer-oriented analyst firm that evaluates content technologies, released research today that finds enterprise search vendors are evolving at a more rapid pace than their products. The research was released in conjunction with The Data Warehousing Institute’s winter conference in Las Vegas, where CMS Watch analysts are leading several sessions.

This analysis stems from CMS Watch’s most recent release of The Enterprise Search Report 2008, which evaluates 20 major enterprise search vendors head-to-head. While several vendors, such as FAST and Mondosoft, have been subject to acquisitions, and others, such as SAP and Oracle, have recently released search offerings, in many ways product marketing is ahead of the actual technology.

CMS Watch’s Netherlands-based contributing analyst, Adriaan Bloem, served as lead researcher. "Despite several large infrastructure vendors touting new search offerings, the technology underneath looks strikingly familiar," said Bloem. "Oracle’s Secure Enterprise Search is a mix of inherited pieces from Text and Ultra Search," Bloem added, "while IBM’s OmniFind is a really collection of acquired technologies."

In addition to legacy technology being re-packaged and marketed as new products, the research also found:

  • Microsoft’s acquisition of FAST reinforces that despite recent product development for SharePoint search, it still lags other enterprise search players and is ill-suited for true multi-repository, enterprise-wide search
  • While SAP recently debuted its own enterprise search tool based largely on the legacy TREX search application, the company’s recent investment in specialized search vendor Endeca demonstrates the vast differences – and gaps that still exist – in enterprise search products
  • Though it's been nearly 3 years since Autonomy acquired prime competitor Verity, the sense of rapid change at the vendor, and with it their suite of tools, continues. Fusing disparate corporate philosophies and technological approaches has taken time, and there’s still a mish-mash of products and technologies in the works

"The turbulent shifts currently happening in the market show just how much infrastructure vendors want to play in the enterprise search space, but the products aren’t evolving quickly enough to meet enterprise needs," said CMS Watch Principal, Theresa Regli. "At the same time, more agile, specialized search vendors want to fill the gaps that the larger vendors currently can’t fill."

To plot the current state of product and vendor evolution among major enterprise search suppliers, CMS Watch has developed a "Vendor Risk Profile."

Enterprise Search: Vendor Risk Profile - 2008
Enterprise Search: Vendor Risk Profile - 2008

[This image is available online at:
http://cmswatch.com/images/CMS-Watch-VRP-Search-2008.bmp (high res)
http://cmswatch.com/images/CMS-Watch-VRP-Search-2008.jpg (low res) ]


"Our goal is not to cite leaders and laggards, but to show the pace at which the products and vendors are evolving," added Regli. "Different states of evolution involve different levels of risk, and buyers should enter the product selection and implementation process with eyes wide open."

A longer analysis of the chart can be found at: http://www.cmswatch.com/Feature/175-Search-2008

About CMS Watch

CMS Watch™ is an analyst firm that provides an independent source of buyer's advice on content technologies. Through highly detailed product evaluation reports, CMS Watch sorts out the complex landscape of potential solutions so enterprise project teams can readily identify and assess technologies suited to their particular requirements. To retain its independence as a vendor-neutral analyst firm, CMS Watch works solely for solutions buyers and never for the vendors it covers.




What we do

CMS Watch™ evaluates content-oriented technologies, publishing head-to-head comparative reviews of leading solutions. What makes us special?

  • Our critical analysis exposes product weaknesses as well as strengths
  • We deliver unrivaled technical depth and comprehensive project advice
  • Our research is led by international topic experts
  • We only work for buyers -- never for vendors

Contact us

CMS Watch

info@cmswatch.com

18113 Town Center Drive, Ste 217

Olney, MD USA 20832

1 800 325 6190 (customer service)

+1 617 763 5336 (int'l customer service)

Fax: +1 214 242 3048