Get the real story via our bi-monthly newsletter

Search

    5
    0

rss

Send to a colleague

Home > About > Press > New Breed of Web Manager 2.0 Replacing Traditional Webmaster Role

Get a Free Sample

Wondering about CMS Watch research? Sign up to receive free samples of any of our products.

Report Excerpt

The XML & Component Content Management Report 2009 looks at... Xpress Author Implementations

"Word is Word, right? Not exactly when it comes to XML-based Word or Xpress Author. Xpress Author (aside from the accelerators and DITA Studio) is not out-of-the box; each implementation is customized to meet specific corporate requirements. User interface design is required to determine the appropriate look-and-feel and functionality. This is both one of its greatest strengths and one of its weaknesses. It means that ..."

(p. 88)

More about The XML & Component Content Management Report 2009

 
FOR RELEASE: 02 October, 2007

CONTACT:
Melinda Powers, Marketing Director, CMS Watch
Tel: + 1 781 690 1779
E-Mail Melinda

NEW BREED OF "WEB MANAGER 2.0" REPLACING TRADITIONAL WEBMASTER ROLE
CMS Watch Finds Web Managers Putting New Demands on Technologies


Silver Spring, MD, USA -- CMS Watch, an independent analyst firm that evaluates content management technologies, released research today finding that a new breed of web manager is emerging to link content management more closely to website visitor satisfaction.

This analysis stems from CMS Watch's 2008 "Web CMS Report," released today, which evaluates 30 major Web Content Management (WCM) offerings. As part of its ongoing research, CMS Watch interviews hundreds of web managers around the world.

Web teams have traditionally emphasized webmaster roles with layout and production skills, sometimes using first-generation WCM tools to automate the HTML conversion process. Automated or not, "shovel and forget" editorial processes frequently led to bloated sites. Says CMS Watch Founder Tony Byrne, "The new web manager looks at information from the consumers' perspective and more often than not, asks, 'what can we get rid of?'"

The new web manager may operate under several professional guises: "customer advocate," "information guru," or "metator," to name just a few. Although they may serve as "power users" of Web CMS tools, they need to employ a very different set of soft skills than traditional webmastering, and many enterprises are struggling with the personnel challenges of this transition.

CMS Watch research findings include:

  • Greater site visitor focus has driven a renewed, industry-wide interest in metadata and classification, with enterprise demands sometimes exceeding what their WCM tools can deliver.
  • Greater emphasis on editorial and graphical standardization is limiting previous ambitions for highly distributed web content development, and compelling enterprises to "dumb down" WCM tool interfaces to the bare essentials for the limited contributions of casual contributors.
  • Many WCM vendors still equate consumer orientation with e-commerce and online marketing, when in fact the need for visitor-centric content and experience pervades all web publishing scenarios -- including Intranets.
  • The new web manager needs a stronger set of reporting tools than what most WCM tools offer today.

"From an industry perspective, there's a real divide between those vendors who provide strong managerial, reporting, and analysis tools to help bridge the gap between content producer and consumer, and those that emphasize distributed publishing for its own sake," argues CMS Watch Analyst, Kas Thomas. "In general, pure-play WCM tools seem to have a closer affinity with the needs of contemporary web teams," Thomas added.

Not surprisingly, many enterprises are evaluating their technology options. "Even customers who are reasonably satisfied with their WCM tools frequently tell us they remain on the look-out for alternatives," noted Byrne. "They sense that the marketplace is evolving, and that some vendors are adapting more nimbly than others."

The 2008 Web CMS Report includes detailed comparisons of 30 vendors across 18 key feature categories, as well as evaluations of individual product suitability for 12 universal CMS scenarios. A separate European Edition focuses on vendors active in that region.

Vendors covered include: Alfresco, CoreMedia, CrownPeak, Day, Drupal, Ektron, EMC|Documentum, FatWire, IBM, Interwoven, Mediasurface, Microsoft, Open Text/RedDot, Oracle/Stellent, PaperThin, Percussion, Plone, Serena, Sitecore, Tridion, Typo3, and Vignette. The Report is available for purchase online from the CMS Watch secure storefront.

About CMS Watch

CMS Watch™ evaluates content-oriented technologies, offering head-to-head comparative reviews of leading solutions. Through highly detailed technical evaluations and online education courses, CMS Watch helps sort out the complex landscape of potential solutions so that buyers can minimize the time and effort to identify technologies suited to their particular requirements. To retain its independence as a totally impartial analyst firm, CMS Watch works solely for solutions buyers and never for vendors.




What we do

CMS Watch™ evaluates content-oriented technologies, publishing head-to-head comparative reviews of leading solutions. What makes us special?

  • Our critical analysis exposes product weaknesses as well as strengths
  • We deliver unrivaled technical depth and comprehensive project advice
  • Our research is led by international topic experts
  • We only work for buyers -- never for vendors

Contact us

CMS Watch

info@cmswatch.com

3470 Olney-Laytonsville Road Suite 131

Olney, MD USA 20832

1 800 325 6190 (customer service)

+1 617 763 5336 (int'l customer service)

Fax: +1 214 242 3048